lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket
[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20240618144344.16943-1-amishin@t-argos.ru>
Date: Tue, 18 Jun 2024 17:43:44 +0300
From: Aleksandr Mishin <amishin@...rgos.ru>
To: Keerthy <j-keerthy@...com>
CC: Aleksandr Mishin <amishin@...rgos.ru>, Linus Walleij
	<linus.walleij@...aro.org>, Bartosz Golaszewski <brgl@...ev.pl>, Grygorii
 Strashko <grygorii.strashko@...com>, <linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org>,
	<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <lvc-project@...uxtesting.org>
Subject: [PATCH] gpio: davinci: Validate the obtained number of IRQs

Value of pdata->gpio_unbanked is taken from Device Tree. In case of broken
DT due to any error this value can be any. Without this value validation
there can be out of chips->irqs array boundaries access in
davinci_gpio_probe().

Validate the obtained nirq value so that it won't exceed the maximum
number of IRQs per bank.

Found by Linux Verification Center (linuxtesting.org) with SVACE.

Fixes: eb3744a2dd01 ("gpio: davinci: Do not assume continuous IRQ numbering")
Signed-off-by: Aleksandr Mishin <amishin@...rgos.ru>
---
 drivers/gpio/gpio-davinci.c | 5 +++++
 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+)

diff --git a/drivers/gpio/gpio-davinci.c b/drivers/gpio/gpio-davinci.c
index bb499e362912..1d0175d6350b 100644
--- a/drivers/gpio/gpio-davinci.c
+++ b/drivers/gpio/gpio-davinci.c
@@ -225,6 +225,11 @@ static int davinci_gpio_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
 	else
 		nirq = DIV_ROUND_UP(ngpio, 16);
 
+	if (nirq > MAX_INT_PER_BANK) {
+		dev_err(dev, "Too many IRQs!\n");
+		return -EINVAL;
+	}
+
 	chips = devm_kzalloc(dev, sizeof(*chips), GFP_KERNEL);
 	if (!chips)
 		return -ENOMEM;
-- 
2.30.2


Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ