[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20240618121356.08f961eb@rorschach.local.home>
Date: Tue, 18 Jun 2024 12:13:56 -0400
From: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
To: Puranjay Mohan <puranjay@...nel.org>
Cc: Paul Walmsley <paul.walmsley@...ive.com>, Palmer Dabbelt
<palmer@...belt.com>, Albert Ou <aou@...s.berkeley.edu>, Samuel Holland
<samuel.holland@...ive.com>, Matthew Bystrin <dev.mbstr@...il.com>,
linux-riscv@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
puranjay12@...il.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] riscv: stacktrace: fix usage of ftrace_graph_ret_addr()
On Tue, 18 Jun 2024 14:58:20 +0000
Puranjay Mohan <puranjay@...nel.org> wrote:
> ftrace_graph_ret_addr() takes an `idx` integer pointer that is used to
> optimize the stack unwinding. Pass it a valid pointer to utilize the
> optimizations that might be available in the future.
>
> The commit is making riscv's usage of ftrace_graph_ret_addr() match
> x86_64.
>
> Signed-off-by: Puranjay Mohan <puranjay@...nel.org>
Not only that, the updated code for ftrace_graph_ret_addr() will just
return the passed in return address if it is NULL. Basically, it will
not work without this.
Reviewed-by: Steven Rostedt (Google) <rostedt@...dmis.org>
-- Steve
> ---
> arch/riscv/kernel/stacktrace.c | 3 ++-
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/riscv/kernel/stacktrace.c b/arch/riscv/kernel/stacktrace.c
> index 528ec7cc9a62..6cb7f9ca9d82 100644
> --- a/arch/riscv/kernel/stacktrace.c
> +++ b/arch/riscv/kernel/stacktrace.c
> @@ -32,6 +32,7 @@ void notrace walk_stackframe(struct task_struct *task, struct pt_regs *regs,
> bool (*fn)(void *, unsigned long), void *arg)
> {
> unsigned long fp, sp, pc;
> + int graph_idx = 0;
> int level = 0;
>
> if (regs) {
> @@ -68,7 +69,7 @@ void notrace walk_stackframe(struct task_struct *task, struct pt_regs *regs,
> pc = regs->ra;
> } else {
> fp = frame->fp;
> - pc = ftrace_graph_ret_addr(current, NULL, frame->ra,
> + pc = ftrace_graph_ret_addr(current, &graph_idx, frame->ra,
> &frame->ra);
> if (pc == (unsigned long)ret_from_exception) {
> if (unlikely(!__kernel_text_address(pc) || !fn(arg, pc)))
Powered by blists - more mailing lists