[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <fdeea79f-4568-4e70-9b49-0c02abc91170@roeck-us.net>
Date: Tue, 18 Jun 2024 09:29:32 -0700
From: Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>
To: Farouk Bouabid <farouk.bouabid@...rry.de>,
Jean Delvare <jdelvare@...e.com>, Andi Shyti <andi.shyti@...nel.org>,
Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>, Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@...nel.org>,
Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>, Lee Jones <lee@...nel.org>,
Quentin Schulz <quentin.schulz@...rry.de>, Peter Rosin <peda@...ntia.se>,
Heiko Stuebner <heiko@...ech.de>
Cc: linux-hwmon@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-i2c@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-rockchip@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 0/9] Add Mule MFD support
On 6/18/24 09:06, Farouk Bouabid wrote:
> Mule is an MCU that emulates a set of I2C devices which are reachable
> through an I2C-mux.
>
> The mux and amc6821 combined make the Mule multi-function device (@0x18)
>
I don't think that is appropriate. Those devices should all have separate
devicetree entries and be modeled as individual i2c devices.
Guenter
Powered by blists - more mailing lists