lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Tue, 18 Jun 2024 08:12:29 +0800
From: Tengfei Fan <quic_tengfan@...cinc.com>
To: Dmitry Baryshkov <dmitry.baryshkov@...aro.org>
CC: <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>, <djakov@...nel.org>, <robh@...nel.org>,
        <conor+dt@...nel.org>, <andersson@...nel.org>,
        <konrad.dybcio@...aro.org>, <linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org>,
        <linux-pm@...r.kernel.org>, <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
        <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <kernel@...cinc.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 0/2] arm64: qcom: Add BWMON support for SA8775p



On 6/17/2024 7:00 PM, Dmitry Baryshkov wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 17, 2024 at 06:42:42PM GMT, Tengfei Fan wrote:
>>
>>
>> On 6/17/2024 5:43 PM, Dmitry Baryshkov wrote:
>>> On Mon, Jun 17, 2024 at 05:29:38PM GMT, Tengfei Fan wrote:
>>>> Add CPU and LLCC BWMON nodes and their corresponding OPP tables for
>>>> SA8775p SoC.
>>>
>>> This series is marked as RFC, Request For Comments. What kind of
>>> comments are expected for the series?
>>>
>>
>> I found that the BWMON patch for x1e80100[1] is currently under review.
>> There are upstream comments suggesting that we reference the same shared OPP
>> table from all the BWMONs that share the same OPP table. However, there will
>> be some DTBS CHECK warnings[2] if we do reference the same shared OPP table.
>>
>> Therefore, I pushed this patch series to collect some comments on whether we
>> can have separate OPP tables for each BWMON, as the OPP table of
>> "pmu@...5400" and "pmu@...6400" in this patch series.
> 
> Thank you for the explanation. Now why wasn't this a part of the cover
> letter?

I think I previously had some misunderstandings about the cover letter. 
I mistakenly thought that certain information should not be included in 
the cover letter. In the future, I will make an effort to include 
complete information in cover letter.

> 
>>
>> [1]
>> https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/4ef1d9a9-6a0e-4324-b6d5-2ae225855b03@linaro.org/
>>
>> [2]
>> arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sa8775p-ride.dtb: pmu@...5400: 'opp-table' is a
>> required property from schema $id:
>> http://devicetree.org/schemas/interconnect/qcom,msm8998-bwmon.yaml#
>>
>>>>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Tengfei Fan <quic_tengfan@...cinc.com>
>>>> ---
>>>>
>>>> This patch series depends on patch series:
>>>> "[PATCH 2/4] soc: qcom: icc-bwmon: Allow for interrupts to be shared across instances"
>>>> https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20240604011157.2358019-3-quic_sibis@quicinc.com/
>>>>
>>>> Tengfei Fan (2):
>>>>     dt-bindings: interconnect: qcom-bwmon: Document SA8775p bwmon
>>>>       compatibles
>>>>     arm64: dts: qcom: sa8775p: Add CPU and LLCC BWMON
>>>>
>>>>    .../interconnect/qcom,msm8998-bwmon.yaml      |   2 +
>>>>    arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sa8775p.dtsi         | 115 ++++++++++++++++++
>>>>    2 files changed, 117 insertions(+)
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> base-commit: 6906a84c482f098d31486df8dc98cead21cce2d0
>>>> -- 
>>>> 2.25.1
>>>>
>>>
>>
>> -- 
>> Thx and BRs,
>> Tengfei Fan
> 

-- 
Thx and BRs,
Tengfei Fan

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ