lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Tue, 18 Jun 2024 11:57:38 -0700
From: Luis Chamberlain <mcgrof@...nel.org>
To: Kris Van Hees <kris.van.hees@...cle.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-kbuild@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-modules@...r.kernel.org, linux-trace-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	Nick Alcock <nick.alcock@...cle.com>,
	Alan Maguire <alan.maguire@...cle.com>,
	Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@...nel.org>,
	Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
	Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@...nel.org>,
	Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@...gle.com>,
	Jiri Olsa <olsajiri@...il.com>,
	Elena Zannoni <elena.zannoni@...cle.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 2/3] kbuild, kconfig: generate offset range data for
 builtin modules

On Fri, Jun 14, 2024 at 01:14:27PM -0400, Kris Van Hees wrote:
> The offset range data for builtin modules is generated using:
>  - modules.builtin: associates object files with module names
>  - vmlinux.map: provides load order of sections and offset of first member
>     per section
>  - vmlinux.o.map: provides offset of object file content per section
>  - .*.cmd: build cmd file with KBUILD_MODFILE and KBUILD_MODNAME

What tests do we have to ensure this is working correctly and not
spewing out lies? What proactive mechanisms do we have to verify the
semantics won't change, or to warn at build time that this awk script
will break upon new changes? Is this just best effort? Is that good
enough? Why?

  Luis

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ