linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v1 1/4] ata: libata: Remove redundant sense

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <ZnHgr2mgWGTDFXaT@google.com>
Date: Tue, 18 Jun 2024 19:31:59 +0000
From: Igor Pylypiv <ipylypiv@...gle.com>
To: Damien Le Moal <dlemoal@...nel.org>
Cc: Niklas Cassel <cassel@...nel.org>, Hannes Reinecke <hare@...e.de>,
	linux-ide@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 1/4] ata: libata: Remove redundant sense_buffer memsets

On Mon, Jun 17, 2024 at 08:13:51AM +0900, Damien Le Moal wrote:
> On 6/15/24 04:18, Igor Pylypiv wrote:
> > scsi_queue_rq() memsets sense_buffer before a command is dispatched.
> > 
> > Libata is not memsetting sense_buffer before setting sense data that
> > was obtained from a disk so there should be no reason to do a memset
> > for ATA PASS-THROUGH / ATAPI.
> 
> This sentence is not very clear at all... I assume that the first part of the
> sentence is for non passthrough commands. In this case, libata does not clear
> the sense buffer because the scsi layer did that already, in scsi_queue_rq() as
> noted above.
> 
> For passthrough commands, the same should be happening as well since passthrough
> commands are also executed through blk_execute_rq() -> scsi_queue_rq(). So I do
> not really understand (but I do agree that the memset() in libata seem useless).

Thanks! I'll update the commit message to make it more clear.

> 
> > Memsetting the sense_buffer in ata_gen_passthru_sense() is erasing valid
> > sense data that was previously obtained from a disk. A follow-up patch
> > will modify ata_gen_passthru_sense() to stop generating sense data based
> > on ATA status register bits if a valid sense data is already present.
> 
> This fix should come first in the series, since that commit will likely need to
> go into current rc and cc-stable. And that will simplify this patch as well.
>
Ack. I'll reorder the commits.

> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Igor Pylypiv <ipylypiv@...gle.com>
> > ---
> >  drivers/ata/libata-eh.c   | 2 --
> >  drivers/ata/libata-scsi.c | 4 ----
> >  2 files changed, 6 deletions(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/drivers/ata/libata-eh.c b/drivers/ata/libata-eh.c
> > index 214b935c2ced..b5e05efe73f6 100644
> > --- a/drivers/ata/libata-eh.c
> > +++ b/drivers/ata/libata-eh.c
> > @@ -1479,8 +1479,6 @@ unsigned int atapi_eh_request_sense(struct ata_device *dev,
> >  	struct ata_port *ap = dev->link->ap;
> >  	struct ata_taskfile tf;
> >  
> > -	memset(sense_buf, 0, SCSI_SENSE_BUFFERSIZE);
> > -
> >  	/* initialize sense_buf with the error register,
> >  	 * for the case where they are -not- overwritten
> >  	 */
> > diff --git a/drivers/ata/libata-scsi.c b/drivers/ata/libata-scsi.c
> > index cdf29b178ddc..032cf11d0bcc 100644
> > --- a/drivers/ata/libata-scsi.c
> > +++ b/drivers/ata/libata-scsi.c
> > @@ -858,8 +858,6 @@ static void ata_gen_passthru_sense(struct ata_queued_cmd *qc)
> >  	unsigned char *desc = sb + 8;
> >  	u8 sense_key, asc, ascq;
> >  
> > -	memset(sb, 0, SCSI_SENSE_BUFFERSIZE);
> > -
> >  	/*
> >  	 * Use ata_to_sense_error() to map status register bits
> >  	 * onto sense key, asc & ascq.
> > @@ -953,8 +951,6 @@ static void ata_gen_ata_sense(struct ata_queued_cmd *qc)
> >  	u64 block;
> >  	u8 sense_key, asc, ascq;
> >  
> > -	memset(sb, 0, SCSI_SENSE_BUFFERSIZE);
> > -
> >  	if (ata_dev_disabled(dev)) {
> >  		/* Device disabled after error recovery */
> >  		/* LOGICAL UNIT NOT READY, HARD RESET REQUIRED */
> 
> -- 
> Damien Le Moal
> Western Digital Research
> 

Thank you,
Igor