lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Tue, 18 Jun 2024 10:35:23 +0200
From: Michal Hocko <mhocko@...e.com>
To: Tim Chen <tim.c.chen@...ux.intel.com>
Cc: Mateusz Guzik <mjguzik@...il.com>, Yu Ma <yu.ma@...el.com>,
	viro@...iv.linux.org.uk, brauner@...nel.org, jack@...e.cz,
	linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	tim.c.chen@...el.com, pan.deng@...el.com, tianyou.li@...el.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3] fs/file.c: move sanity_check from alloc_fd() to
 put_unused_fd()

On Mon 17-06-24 11:04:41, Tim Chen wrote:
> diff --git a/kernel/sys.c b/kernel/sys.c
> index 3a2df1bd9f64..b4e523728c3e 100644
> --- a/kernel/sys.c
> +++ b/kernel/sys.c
> @@ -1471,6 +1471,7 @@ static int do_prlimit(struct task_struct *tsk, unsigned int resource,
>                 return -EINVAL;
>         resource = array_index_nospec(resource, RLIM_NLIMITS);
>  
> +       task_lock(tsk->group_leader);
>         if (new_rlim) {
>                 if (new_rlim->rlim_cur > new_rlim->rlim_max)
>                         return -EINVAL;

This is clearly broken as it leaves the lock behind on the error, no?
-- 
Michal Hocko
SUSE Labs

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ