linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v3] selftests: livepatch: Test atomic replace against multiple modules

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date: Tue, 18 Jun 2024 10:44:36 +0200
From: Petr Mladek <pmladek@...e.com>
To: Marcos Paulo de Souza <mpdesouza@...e.com>
Cc: Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@...nel.org>, Jiri Kosina <jikos@...nel.org>,
	Miroslav Benes <mbenes@...e.cz>,
	Joe Lawrence <joe.lawrence@...hat.com>,
	Shuah Khan <shuah@...nel.org>, live-patching@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] selftests: livepatch: Test atomic replace against
 multiple modules

On Mon 2024-06-03 14:26:19, Marcos Paulo de Souza wrote:
> Adapt the current test-livepatch.sh script to account the number of
> applied livepatches and ensure that an atomic replace livepatch disables
> all previously applied livepatches.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Marcos Paulo de Souza <mpdesouza@...e.com>
> ---
> Changes since v2:
> * Used variables to stop the name of other livepatches applied to test
>   the atomic replace. (Joe)

It might have been better to do the change in two patches. First one
would just add the "1" suffix to the one livepatch. Second patch
would extend the test.

But it is not worth another respin. I am going to push this version
(with the typo fixed).

Reviewed-by: Petr Mladek <pmladek@...e.com>

Best Regards,
Petr