linux-kernel - Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the mediatek tree

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <be5a8b12-b042-48cc-9508-759a2a285a8b@kernel.org>
Date: Tue, 18 Jun 2024 12:20:31 +0200
From: AngeloGioacchino Del Regno <angelogioacchino.delregno@...nel.org>
To: Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>, Matthias Brugger <matthias.bgg@...il.com>
Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
 Linux Next Mailing List <linux-next@...r.kernel.org>,
 Julien Panis <jpanis@...libre.com>, Nicolas Pitre <npitre@...libre.com>
Subject: Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the mediatek tree

Il 18/06/24 12:03, AngeloGioacchino Del Regno ha scritto:
> Il 18/06/24 09:49, Julien Panis ha scritto:
>> On 6/17/24 18:44, Mark Brown wrote:
>>> Hi all,
>>>
>>> After merging the mediatek tree, today's linux-next build (arm64
>>> defconfig) failed like this:
>>>
>>> /tmp/next/build/arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk3568-wolfvision-pf5-display.dtsi:113.6-121.3: Warning (graph_port): /fragment@..._overlay__: graph port node name should be 'port'
>>> Error: /tmp/next/build/arch/arm64/boot/dts/mediatek/mt8186.dtsi:2399.29-30 
>>> syntax error
>>> FATAL ERROR: Unable to parse input tree
>>> make[4]: *** [/tmp/next/build/scripts/Makefile.lib:431: 
>>> arch/arm64/boot/dts/mediatek/mt8186-corsola-magneton-sku393216.dtb] Error 1
>>>
>>> Caused by commit
>>>
>>>    d7c1bde38bf37a5 ("arm64: dts: mediatek: mt8186: add default thermal zones")
>>>
>>> I have used the last version of the mediatek tree from 20240613 instead.
>>
>> Hello Mark,
>>
>> Here is the explanation:
>> https://lore.kernel.org/all/71d53ff6-fdae-440d-b60d-3ae6f0c881d9@baylibre.com/
>> https://lore.kernel.org/all/6d9e0f19-9851-4f23-a8b8-6acc82ae7a3d@baylibre.com/
>>
>> For some reason, the 2 first commits of the series were not applied
>> with the dts. These commits are needed because they contain some
>> definitions used by the dts.
>>
>> Julien
> 
> I'm not sure how should I proceed here.
> 

Reiterating, I'm sure how should I proceed.

I'm removing those patches from mediatek for-next until further notice.

Regards,
Angelo

> Only the mediatek tree is broken, linux-next is ok... should I pick the
> commits from next or should I remove the dts commits from the mediatek trees?
> 
> First time happening.... :-)
> 
> Regards,
> Angelo