| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <20240618121327.2177-2-kaiyen.chang@intel.com>
Date: Tue, 18 Jun 2024 20:13:27 +0800
From: Kaiyen Chang <kaiyen.chang@...el.com>
To: rafael@...nel.org,
pavel@....cz,
len.brown@...el.com,
gregkh@...uxfoundation.org,
linux-pm@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: kaiyen.chang@...el.com
Subject: [PATCH v2 1/1] PM: Start asynchronous suspend threads upfront
Currently, when performing a suspend operation, all devices on the
dpm_list must wait for the "synchronous" devices that are listed
after them to complete before the main suspend thread can start
their suspend routines, even if they are "asynchronous". If the
suspend routine of a synchronous device must enter a waiting state
for some reason, it will cause the main suspend thread to go to
sleep, thereby delaying the processing of all subsequent devices,
including asynchronous ones, ultimately extending the overall
suspend time.
By starting the asynchronous suspend threads upfront, we can allow
the system to handle the suspend routines of these asynchronous
devices in parallel, without waiting for the suspend routines of
the synchronous devices listed after them to complete, and without
breaking their order with respect to their parents and children.
This way, even if the main suspend thread is blocked, these
asynchronous suspend threads can continue to run without being
affected.
Signed-off-by: Kaiyen Chang <kaiyen.chang@...el.com>
---
Change from v1: Fix some unclear parts in the commit messages.
---
drivers/base/power/main.c | 90 +++++++++++++++++++++++++--------------
1 file changed, 57 insertions(+), 33 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/base/power/main.c b/drivers/base/power/main.c
index 4a67e83300e1..6ddd6ef36625 100644
--- a/drivers/base/power/main.c
+++ b/drivers/base/power/main.c
@@ -1283,6 +1283,7 @@ static void async_suspend_noirq(void *data, async_cookie_t cookie)
static int dpm_noirq_suspend_devices(pm_message_t state)
{
+ struct device *dev;
ktime_t starttime = ktime_get();
int error = 0;
@@ -1293,26 +1294,33 @@ static int dpm_noirq_suspend_devices(pm_message_t state)
mutex_lock(&dpm_list_mtx);
+ /*
+ * Trigger the suspend of "async" devices upfront so they don't have to
+ * wait for the "non-async" ones that don't depend on them.
+ */
+
+ list_for_each_entry_reverse(dev, &dpm_late_early_list, power.entry)
+ dpm_async_fn(dev, async_suspend_noirq);
+
while (!list_empty(&dpm_late_early_list)) {
- struct device *dev = to_device(dpm_late_early_list.prev);
+ dev = to_device(dpm_late_early_list.prev);
list_move(&dev->power.entry, &dpm_noirq_list);
- if (dpm_async_fn(dev, async_suspend_noirq))
- continue;
-
- get_device(dev);
+ if (!dev->power.async_in_progress) {
+ get_device(dev);
- mutex_unlock(&dpm_list_mtx);
+ mutex_unlock(&dpm_list_mtx);
- error = device_suspend_noirq(dev, state, false);
+ error = device_suspend_noirq(dev, state, false);
- put_device(dev);
+ put_device(dev);
- mutex_lock(&dpm_list_mtx);
+ mutex_lock(&dpm_list_mtx);
- if (error || async_error)
- break;
+ if (error || async_error)
+ break;
+ }
}
mutex_unlock(&dpm_list_mtx);
@@ -1454,6 +1462,7 @@ static void async_suspend_late(void *data, async_cookie_t cookie)
*/
int dpm_suspend_late(pm_message_t state)
{
+ struct device *dev;
ktime_t starttime = ktime_get();
int error = 0;
@@ -1466,26 +1475,33 @@ int dpm_suspend_late(pm_message_t state)
mutex_lock(&dpm_list_mtx);
+ /*
+ * Trigger the suspend of "async" devices upfront so they don't have to
+ * wait for the "non-async" ones that don't depend on them.
+ */
+
+ list_for_each_entry_reverse(dev, &dpm_suspended_list, power.entry)
+ dpm_async_fn(dev, async_suspend_late);
+
while (!list_empty(&dpm_suspended_list)) {
- struct device *dev = to_device(dpm_suspended_list.prev);
+ dev = to_device(dpm_suspended_list.prev);
list_move(&dev->power.entry, &dpm_late_early_list);
- if (dpm_async_fn(dev, async_suspend_late))
- continue;
-
- get_device(dev);
+ if (!dev->power.async_in_progress) {
+ get_device(dev);
- mutex_unlock(&dpm_list_mtx);
+ mutex_unlock(&dpm_list_mtx);
- error = device_suspend_late(dev, state, false);
+ error = device_suspend_late(dev, state, false);
- put_device(dev);
+ put_device(dev);
- mutex_lock(&dpm_list_mtx);
+ mutex_lock(&dpm_list_mtx);
- if (error || async_error)
- break;
+ if (error || async_error)
+ break;
+ }
}
mutex_unlock(&dpm_list_mtx);
@@ -1719,6 +1735,7 @@ static void async_suspend(void *data, async_cookie_t cookie)
*/
int dpm_suspend(pm_message_t state)
{
+ struct device *dev;
ktime_t starttime = ktime_get();
int error = 0;
@@ -1733,26 +1750,33 @@ int dpm_suspend(pm_message_t state)
mutex_lock(&dpm_list_mtx);
+ /*
+ * Trigger the suspend of "async" devices upfront so they don't have to
+ * wait for the "non-async" ones that don't depend on them.
+ */
+
+ list_for_each_entry_reverse(dev, &dpm_prepared_list, power.entry)
+ dpm_async_fn(dev, async_suspend);
+
while (!list_empty(&dpm_prepared_list)) {
- struct device *dev = to_device(dpm_prepared_list.prev);
+ dev = to_device(dpm_prepared_list.prev);
list_move(&dev->power.entry, &dpm_suspended_list);
- if (dpm_async_fn(dev, async_suspend))
- continue;
-
- get_device(dev);
+ if (!dev->power.async_in_progress) {
+ get_device(dev);
- mutex_unlock(&dpm_list_mtx);
+ mutex_unlock(&dpm_list_mtx);
- error = device_suspend(dev, state, false);
+ error = device_suspend(dev, state, false);
- put_device(dev);
+ put_device(dev);
- mutex_lock(&dpm_list_mtx);
+ mutex_lock(&dpm_list_mtx);
- if (error || async_error)
- break;
+ if (error || async_error)
+ break;
+ }
}
mutex_unlock(&dpm_list_mtx);
--
2.34.1
Powered by blists - more mailing lists