linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v4, 3/3] usb: dwc3: core: Workaround for CSR read timeout

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAMtoTm1ZkT6NoBj9N-wKkzxASQ2AboYNdd-L7DHUEt8m8hootg@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 18 Jun 2024 20:47:38 +0800
From: joswang <joswang1221@...il.com>
To: Thinh Nguyen <Thinh.Nguyen@...opsys.com>
Cc: Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>, 
	"linux-usb@...r.kernel.org" <linux-usb@...r.kernel.org>, 
	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, 
	"stable@...r.kernel.org" <stable@...r.kernel.org>, Jos Wang <joswang@...ovo.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4, 3/3] usb: dwc3: core: Workaround for CSR read timeout

On Tue, Jun 18, 2024 at 8:05 AM Thinh Nguyen <Thinh.Nguyen@...opsys.com> wrote:
>
> On Thu, Jun 13, 2024, joswang wrote:
> > On Thu, Jun 13, 2024 at 1:04 AM Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org> wrote:
> > >
> > > On Wed, Jun 12, 2024 at 11:39:22PM +0800, joswang wrote:
> > > > From: Jos Wang <joswang@...ovo.com>
> > > >
> > > > This is a workaround for STAR 4846132, which only affects
> > > > DWC_usb31 version2.00a operating in host mode.
> > > >
> > > > There is a problem in DWC_usb31 version 2.00a operating
> > > > in host mode that would cause a CSR read timeout When CSR
> > > > read coincides with RAM Clock Gating Entry. By disable
> > > > Clock Gating, sacrificing power consumption for normal
> > > > operation.
> > > >
> > > > Cc: stable@...r.kernel.org
> > > > Signed-off-by: Jos Wang <joswang@...ovo.com>
> > > > ---
> > > > v1 -> v2:
> > > > - add "dt-bindings: usb: dwc3: Add snps,p2p3tranok quirk" patch,
> > > >   this patch does not make any changes
> > > > v2 -> v3:
> > > > - code refactor
> > > > - modify comment, add STAR number, workaround applied in host mode
> > > > - modify commit message, add STAR number, workaround applied in host mode
> > > > - modify Author Jos Wang
> > > > v3 -> v4:
> > > > - modify commit message, add Cc: stable@...r.kernel.org
> > >
> > > This thread is crazy, look at:
> > >         https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://lore.kernel.org/all/20240612153922.2531-1-joswang1221@gmail.com/__;!!A4F2R9G_pg!a29V9NsG_rMKPnub-JtIe5I_lAoJmzK8dgo3UK-qD_xpT_TOgyPb6LkEMkIsijsDKIgdxB_QVLW_MwtdQLnyvOujOA$
> > > for how it looks.  How do I pick out the proper patches to review/apply
> > > there at all?  What would you do if you were in my position except just
> > > delete the whole thing?
> > >
> > > Just properly submit new versions of patches (hint, without the ','), as
> > > the documentation file says to, as new threads each time, with all
> > > commits, and all should be fine.
> > >
> > > We even have tools that can do this for you semi-automatically, why not
> > > use them?
> > >
> > > thanks,
> > >
> > > greg k-h
> >
> > We apologize for any inconvenience this may cause.
> > The following incorrect operation caused the problem you mentioned:
> > git send-email --in-reply-to command sends the new version patch
> > git format-patch --subject-prefix='PATCH v3
> >
> > Should I resend the v5 patch now?
>
> Please send this as a stand-alone patch outside of the series as v5. (ie.
> remove the "3/3"). I still need to review the other issue of the series.
>
> Thanks,
> Thinh

This patch has been sent separately, please help review it.

Thanks
Jos Wang