linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2 0/2] mm: swap: mTHP swap allocator base on swap cluster order

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <ce9cb3c5-be63-45f0-91ad-4f7ab335d3b2@redhat.com>
Date: Tue, 18 Jun 2024 15:08:02 +0200
From: David Hildenbrand <david@...hat.com>
To: Chris Li <chrisl@...nel.org>, Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc: Kairui Song <kasong@...cent.com>, Ryan Roberts <ryan.roberts@....com>,
 "Huang, Ying" <ying.huang@...el.com>, Kalesh Singh <kaleshsingh@...gle.com>,
 linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-mm@...ck.org,
 Barry Song <baohua@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/2] mm: swap: mTHP swap allocator base on swap cluster
 order

On 15.06.24 01:48, Chris Li wrote:
> This is the short term solutiolns "swap cluster order" listed
> in my "Swap Abstraction" discussion slice 8 in the recent
> LSF/MM conference.
> 
> When commit 845982eb264bc "mm: swap: allow storage of all mTHP
> orders" is introduced, it only allocates the mTHP swap entries
> from new empty cluster list.  It has a fragmentation issue
> reported by Barry.
> 
> https://lore.kernel.org/all/CAGsJ_4zAcJkuW016Cfi6wicRr8N9X+GJJhgMQdSMp+Ah+NSgNQ@mail.gmail.com/
> 
> The mTHP allocation failure rate raises to almost 100% after a few
> hours in Barry's test run.
> 
> The reason is that all the empty cluster has been exhausted while
> there are planty of free swap entries to in the cluster that is
> not 100% free.
> 
> Remember the swap allocation order in the cluster.
> Keep track of the per order non full cluster list for later allocation.
> 
> This greatly improve the sucess rate of the mTHP swap allocation.
> 
> There is some test number in the V1 thread of this series:
> https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240524-swap-allocator-v1-0-47861b423b26@kernel.org
> 
> Reported-by: Barry Song <21cnbao@...il.com>
> Signed-off-by: Chris Li <chrisl@...nel.org>
> ---

Running the cow.c selftest with a bunch of debug config
settings enabled, I get on mm-unstable:

[   25.236555] list_add corruption. prev->next should be next (ffff888105b5ad08), but was ffff888105b5ae78. (prev=ffff88812580b048).
[   25.237432] ------------[ cut here ]------------
[   25.237702] kernel BUG at lib/list_debug.c:32!
[   25.237962] Oops: invalid opcode: 0000 [#1] PREEMPT SMP NOPTI
[   25.238288] CPU: 23 PID: 1264 Comm: cow Tainted: G        W          6.10.0-rc4+ #301
[   25.238720] Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009), BIOS rel-1.16.3-0-ga6ed6b701f0a-prebuilt.qemu.org 04/01/2014
[   25.239335] RIP: 0010:__list_add_valid_or_report+0x78/0xa0
[   25.239646] Code: 6b ff 0f 0b 48 89 c1 48 c7 c7 c0 30 0e 83 e8 7f e5 6b ff 0f 0b 48 89 d1 48 89 c6 4c 89 c2 48 c7 c7 18 31 0e 83 e8 68 e5 6b ff <0f> 0b 48 89 f2 48 89 c1 48 89 fe 48 c7 c7 70 31 0e 83 e8 51 e5b
[   25.240670] RSP: 0000:ffffc90002c87bd0 EFLAGS: 00010246
[   25.240964] RAX: 0000000000000075 RBX: ffff888105b5ac00 RCX: 0000000000000000
[   25.241362] RDX: 0000000000000000 RSI: ffff88885f9a1a00 RDI: ffff88885f9a1a00
[   25.241762] RBP: ffff88810624de20 R08: 0000000000000000 R09: 0000000000000003
[   25.242158] R10: ffffc90002c87a78 R11: ffffffff83b5b808 R12: 0000000000044000
[   25.242556] R13: 0000000000044000 R14: ffff88810624e000 R15: ffff88812580bb00
[   25.242960] FS:  00007f4fb364b740(0000) GS:ffff88885f980000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000
[   25.243413] CS:  0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033
[   25.243737] CR2: 00007f4fb343c000 CR3: 000000010a5dc000 CR4: 0000000000750ef0
[   25.244145] PKRU: 55555554
[   25.244303] Call Trace:
[   25.244445]  <TASK>
[   25.244572]  ? die+0x36/0x90
[   25.244742]  ? do_trap+0xdd/0x100
[   25.244935]  ? __list_add_valid_or_report+0x78/0xa0
[   25.245211]  ? __list_add_valid_or_report+0x78/0xa0
[   25.245488]  ? do_error_trap+0x81/0x110
[   25.245710]  ? __list_add_valid_or_report+0x78/0xa0
[   25.245988]  ? exc_invalid_op+0x50/0x70
[   25.246211]  ? __list_add_valid_or_report+0x78/0xa0
[   25.246488]  ? asm_exc_invalid_op+0x1a/0x20
[   25.246737]  ? __list_add_valid_or_report+0x78/0xa0
[   25.247016]  swapcache_free_entries+0x1ec/0x240
[   25.247286]  free_swap_slot+0xcc/0xe0
[   25.247498]  put_swap_folio+0xf3/0x3b0
[   25.247720]  delete_from_swap_cache+0x68/0x90
[   25.247972]  folio_free_swap+0xd0/0x200
[   25.248201]  do_swap_page+0xd95/0x12d0
[   25.248418]  ? __entry_text_end+0x101e45/0x101e49
[   25.248695]  ? srso_alias_return_thunk+0x5/0xfbef5
[   25.248969]  ? srso_alias_return_thunk+0x5/0xfbef5
[   25.249246]  ? __pte_offset_map+0x18e/0x270
[   25.249490]  __handle_mm_fault+0x915/0xf80
[   25.249731]  ? srso_alias_return_thunk+0x5/0xfbef5
[   25.250010]  handle_mm_fault+0x1d1/0x400
[   25.250242]  do_user_addr_fault+0x16f/0x790
[   25.250485]  exc_page_fault+0x83/0x260
[   25.250706]  asm_exc_page_fault+0x26/0x30



Maybe what Hugh reported already. I'll try reverting your patches
to see if that fixes these issues.

-- 
Cheers,

David / dhildenb