[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAJaqyWd3yiPUMaGEmzgHF-8u+HcqjUxBNB3=Xg6Lon-zYNVCow@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 19 Jun 2024 17:54:09 +0200
From: Eugenio Perez Martin <eperezma@...hat.com>
To: Dragos Tatulea <dtatulea@...dia.com>
Cc: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@...hat.com>, Jason Wang <jasowang@...hat.com>,
Xuan Zhuo <xuanzhuo@...ux.alibaba.com>, Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@...dia.com>,
Leon Romanovsky <leon@...nel.org>, Tariq Toukan <tariqt@...dia.com>, Si-Wei Liu <si-wei.liu@...cle.com>,
virtualization@...ts.linux.dev, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-rdma@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
Cosmin Ratiu <cratiu@...dia.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH vhost 20/23] vdpa/mlx5: Pre-create hardware VQs at vdpa
.dev_add time
On Mon, Jun 17, 2024 at 5:09 PM Dragos Tatulea <dtatulea@...dia.com> wrote:
>
> Currently, hardware VQs are created right when the vdpa device gets into
> DRIVER_OK state. That is easier because most of the VQ state is known by
> then.
>
> This patch switches to creating all VQs and their associated resources
> at device creation time. The motivation is to reduce the vdpa device
> live migration downtime by moving the expensive operation of creating
> all the hardware VQs and their associated resources out of downtime on
> the destination VM.
>
> The VQs are now created in a blank state. The VQ configuration will
> happen later, on DRIVER_OK. Then the configuration will be applied when
> the VQs are moved to the Ready state.
>
> When .set_vq_ready() is called on a VQ before DRIVER_OK, special care is
> needed: now that the VQ is already created a resume_vq() will be
> triggered too early when no mr has been configured yet. Skip calling
> resume_vq() in this case, let it be handled during DRIVER_OK.
>
> For virtio-vdpa, the device configuration is done earlier during
> .vdpa_dev_add() by vdpa_register_device(). Avoid calling
> setup_vq_resources() a second time in that case.
>
I guess this happens if virtio_vdpa is already loaded, but I cannot
see how this is different here. Apart from the IOTLB, what else does
it change from the mlx5_vdpa POV?
> Signed-off-by: Dragos Tatulea <dtatulea@...dia.com>
> Reviewed-by: Cosmin Ratiu <cratiu@...dia.com>
> ---
> drivers/vdpa/mlx5/net/mlx5_vnet.c | 37 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----
> 1 file changed, 32 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/vdpa/mlx5/net/mlx5_vnet.c b/drivers/vdpa/mlx5/net/mlx5_vnet.c
> index 249b5afbe34a..b2836fd3d1dd 100644
> --- a/drivers/vdpa/mlx5/net/mlx5_vnet.c
> +++ b/drivers/vdpa/mlx5/net/mlx5_vnet.c
> @@ -2444,7 +2444,7 @@ static void mlx5_vdpa_set_vq_ready(struct vdpa_device *vdev, u16 idx, bool ready
> mvq = &ndev->vqs[idx];
> if (!ready) {
> suspend_vq(ndev, mvq);
> - } else {
> + } else if (mvdev->status & VIRTIO_CONFIG_S_DRIVER_OK) {
> if (resume_vq(ndev, mvq))
> ready = false;
> }
> @@ -3078,10 +3078,18 @@ static void mlx5_vdpa_set_status(struct vdpa_device *vdev, u8 status)
> goto err_setup;
> }
> register_link_notifier(ndev);
> - err = setup_vq_resources(ndev, true);
> - if (err) {
> - mlx5_vdpa_warn(mvdev, "failed to setup driver\n");
> - goto err_driver;
> + if (ndev->setup) {
> + err = resume_vqs(ndev);
> + if (err) {
> + mlx5_vdpa_warn(mvdev, "failed to resume VQs\n");
> + goto err_driver;
> + }
> + } else {
> + err = setup_vq_resources(ndev, true);
> + if (err) {
> + mlx5_vdpa_warn(mvdev, "failed to setup driver\n");
> + goto err_driver;
> + }
> }
> } else {
> mlx5_vdpa_warn(mvdev, "did not expect DRIVER_OK to be cleared\n");
> @@ -3142,6 +3150,7 @@ static int mlx5_vdpa_compat_reset(struct vdpa_device *vdev, u32 flags)
> if (mlx5_vdpa_create_dma_mr(mvdev))
> mlx5_vdpa_warn(mvdev, "create MR failed\n");
> }
> + setup_vq_resources(ndev, false);
> up_write(&ndev->reslock);
>
> return 0;
> @@ -3836,8 +3845,21 @@ static int mlx5_vdpa_dev_add(struct vdpa_mgmt_dev *v_mdev, const char *name,
> goto err_reg;
>
> mgtdev->ndev = ndev;
> +
> + /* For virtio-vdpa, the device was set up during device register. */
> + if (ndev->setup)
> + return 0;
> +
> + down_write(&ndev->reslock);
> + err = setup_vq_resources(ndev, false);
> + up_write(&ndev->reslock);
> + if (err)
> + goto err_setup_vq_res;
> +
> return 0;
>
> +err_setup_vq_res:
> + _vdpa_unregister_device(&mvdev->vdev);
> err_reg:
> destroy_workqueue(mvdev->wq);
> err_res2:
> @@ -3863,6 +3885,11 @@ static void mlx5_vdpa_dev_del(struct vdpa_mgmt_dev *v_mdev, struct vdpa_device *
>
> unregister_link_notifier(ndev);
> _vdpa_unregister_device(dev);
> +
> + down_write(&ndev->reslock);
> + teardown_vq_resources(ndev);
> + up_write(&ndev->reslock);
> +
> wq = mvdev->wq;
> mvdev->wq = NULL;
> destroy_workqueue(wq);
>
> --
> 2.45.1
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists