[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20240619162124.GFZnMFhPW3wo2Avezo@fat_crate.local>
Date: Wed, 19 Jun 2024 18:21:24 +0200
From: Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>
To: Dave Martin <Dave.Martin@....com>
Cc: linux-tip-commits@...r.kernel.org,
Reinette Chatre <reinette.chatre@...el.com>, x86@...nel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [tip: x86/urgent] x86/resctrl: Don't try to free nonexistent
RMIDs
On Wed, Jun 19, 2024 at 05:03:03PM +0100, Dave Martin wrote:
> It's still a guideline, no? (Though I admit that common sense has to
> apply and there are quite often good reasons to bust the limit in
> code.) But commit messages are not code, and don't suffer from
> creeping indentation that eats up half of each line, so the rationale
> is not really the same.
Just do a "git log" on mainline and marvel at all the possible "formatting".
The ship on being able to read commit messages with formatting that fits what
you're expecting has long sailed.
> Anyway, I was just mildly surprised, it's not a huge deal.
Yeah, we don't have a strict rule. And I don't think you can make everyone
agree and then adhere to some rule for commit messages width. But hey... :-)
> (Quoted: "Text-based e-mail should not exceed 80 columns per line of
> text. Consult the documentation of your e-mail client to enable proper
> line breaks around column 78.". No statement about commit messages,
> and "should not exceed" is not the same as "should be wrapped to".
> This document doesn't seem to consider how git formats text derived
> from emails.)
See above.
I'm willing to consider a rule for commit messages if the majority agrees on
some rule.
Thx.
--
Regards/Gruss,
Boris.
https://people.kernel.org/tglx/notes-about-netiquette
Powered by blists - more mailing lists