[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <e3c12062-9bb3-40fd-8b55-5cecbd2fda4b@baylibre.com>
Date: Wed, 19 Jun 2024 12:24:28 -0500
From: David Lechner <dlechner@...libre.com>
To: Marcelo Schmitt <marcelo.schmitt@...log.com>, broonie@...nel.org,
lars@...afoo.de, Michael.Hennerich@...log.com, jic23@...nel.org,
robh+dt@...nel.org, krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org, conor+dt@...nel.org,
nuno.sa@...log.com, marcelo.schmitt1@...il.com
Cc: linux-iio@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
linux-spi@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 1/6] spi: Enable controllers to extend the SPI protocol
with MOSI idle configuration
On 6/18/24 6:10 PM, Marcelo Schmitt wrote:
...
> @@ -3928,7 +3934,8 @@ int spi_setup(struct spi_device *spi)
> * so it is ignored here.
> */
> bad_bits = spi->mode & ~(spi->controller->mode_bits | SPI_CS_WORD |
> - SPI_NO_TX | SPI_NO_RX);
> + SPI_NO_TX | SPI_NO_RX | SPI_MOSI_IDLE_LOW |
> + SPI_MOSI_IDLE_HIGH);
This looks wrong to me. Adding flags here causes them to be ignored
rather than to be checked.
I also did a runtime check with a random driver and a SPI controller
that does not have the flag.
spi->mode |= SPI_MOSI_IDLE_LOW;
ret = spi_setup(spi);
if (ret)
return ret;
It incorrectly passes when used with this change but correctly fails
without this change.
> ugly_bits = bad_bits &
> (SPI_TX_DUAL | SPI_TX_QUAD | SPI_TX_OCTAL |
> SPI_RX_DUAL | SPI_RX_QUAD | SPI_RX_OCTAL);
Powered by blists - more mailing lists