linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v4 2/2] power: supply: add support for MAX1720x standalone fuel gauge

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date: Wed, 19 Jun 2024 08:14:07 +0200
From: Dimitri Fedrau <dima.fedrau@...il.com>
To: Sebastian Reichel <sebastian.reichel@...labora.com>
Cc: Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>, Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@...nel.org>,
	Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>, linux-pm@...r.kernel.org,
	devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	Thomas Weißschuh <thomas@...ch.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 2/2] power: supply: add support for MAX1720x
 standalone fuel gauge

Am Wed, Jun 19, 2024 at 01:19:32AM +0200 schrieb Sebastian Reichel:
> Hi,
>
> On Mon, Jun 17, 2024 at 08:45:04PM GMT, Dimitri Fedrau wrote:
> > The MAX17201 monitors a single cell pack. The MAX17205 monitors and
> > balances a 2S or 3S pack or monitors a multiple-series cell pack. Both
> > devices use a I2C interface.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Dimitri Fedrau <dima.fedrau@...il.com>
> > ---
> 
> [...]
> 
> > +static int max1720x_read_word_data_nvmem(struct i2c_client *ancillary, u8 addr)
> > +{
> > +	u8 rx[2];
> > +	struct i2c_msg msgs[] = {
> > +		{
> > +			.addr = ancillary->addr,
> > +			.flags = 0,
> > +			.len = 1,
> > +			.buf = &addr,
> > +		},
> > +		{
> > +			.addr = ancillary->addr,
> > +			.flags = I2C_M_RD,
> > +			.len = 2,
> > +			.buf = &rx[0],
> > +		},
> > +	};
> > +	int ret;
> > +
> > +	ret = i2c_transfer(ancillary->adapter, msgs, ARRAY_SIZE(msgs));
> > +	if (ret != ARRAY_SIZE(msgs))
> > +		return ret < 0 ? ret : -EIO;
> > +
> > +	return get_unaligned_le16(&rx[0]);
> > +}
> 
> Have you tried using i2c_smbus_read_word_data(ancillary, addr)
> instead of the above?
>
Yes, I did and it worked. Used it in V3 and changed it due to review
comments by Thomas which make sense to me. I don't have any preference on
this. Should I change it back ?
> [...]
> 
[...]

Dimitri