[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <95c4d5e165992e8b775ec41a6948bda400b4c82f.camel@icenowy.me>
Date: Wed, 19 Jun 2024 15:37:36 +0800
From: Icenowy Zheng <uwu@...nowy.me>
To: Jarkko Nikula <jarkko.nikula@...ux.intel.com>, Thomas Bonnefille
<thomas.bonnefille@...tlin.com>, Andi Shyti <andi.shyti@...nel.org>, Rob
Herring <robh@...nel.org>, Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@...nel.org>, Conor
Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>, Jisheng Zhang <jszhang@...nel.org>, Guo Ren
<guoren@...nel.org>, Fu Wei <wefu@...hat.com>, Drew Fustini
<dfustini@...storrent.com>, Emil Renner Berthing
<emil.renner.berthing@...onical.com>, Conor Dooley <conor@...nel.org>
Cc: Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@...belt.com>, Albert Ou <aou@...s.berkeley.edu>,
Paul Walmsley <paul.walmsley@...ive.com>, Thomas Petazzoni
<thomas.petazzoni@...tlin.com>, Miquèl Raynal
<miquel.raynal@...tlin.com>, linux-i2c@...r.kernel.org,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-riscv@...ts.infradead.org, Conor Dooley <conor.dooley@...rochip.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 1/3] dt-bindings: i2c: dw: Document compatible
thead,th1520-i2c
在 2024-06-19星期三的 09:40 +0300,Jarkko Nikula写道:
>
> Your comment below makes me thinking is this change needed? So is it
> enough to specify "snps,designware-i2c" for the compatible string in
> patch 2/3?
I think it's a common practice to have a SoC-specific compatible along
with the specific compatible, in case any silicon quirk is found.
>
> "It appears that the TH1520 I2C is already supported in the upstream
> kernel through the Synopsis Designware I2C adapter driver."
Powered by blists - more mailing lists