lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Wed, 19 Jun 2024 09:40:27 +0200
From: AngeloGioacchino Del Regno <angelogioacchino.delregno@...nel.org>
To: Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@...aro.org>,
 Julien Panis <jpanis@...libre.com>, Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>,
 Matthias Brugger <matthias.bgg@...il.com>
Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
 Linux Next Mailing List <linux-next@...r.kernel.org>,
 Nicolas Pitre <npitre@...libre.com>
Subject: Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the mediatek tree

Il 18/06/24 20:03, Daniel Lezcano ha scritto:
> On 18/06/2024 18:45, Julien Panis wrote:
>> On 6/18/24 12:20, AngeloGioacchino Del Regno wrote:
>>> Il 18/06/24 12:03, AngeloGioacchino Del Regno ha scritto:
>>>> Il 18/06/24 09:49, Julien Panis ha scritto:
>>>>> On 6/17/24 18:44, Mark Brown wrote:
>>>>>> Hi all,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> After merging the mediatek tree, today's linux-next build (arm64
>>>>>> defconfig) failed like this:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> /tmp/next/build/arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk3568-wolfvision-pf5-display.dtsi:113.6-121.3: Warning (graph_port): /fragment@..._overlay__: graph port node name should be 'port'
>>>>>> Error: /tmp/next/build/arch/arm64/boot/dts/mediatek/mt8186.dtsi:2399.29-30 
>>>>>> syntax error
>>>>>> FATAL ERROR: Unable to parse input tree
>>>>>> make[4]: *** [/tmp/next/build/scripts/Makefile.lib:431: 
>>>>>> arch/arm64/boot/dts/mediatek/mt8186-corsola-magneton-sku393216.dtb] Error 1
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Caused by commit
>>>>>>
>>>>>>    d7c1bde38bf37a5 ("arm64: dts: mediatek: mt8186: add default thermal zones")
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I have used the last version of the mediatek tree from 20240613 instead.
>>>>>
>>>>> Hello Mark,
>>>>>
>>>>> Here is the explanation:
>>>>> https://lore.kernel.org/all/71d53ff6-fdae-440d-b60d-3ae6f0c881d9@baylibre.com/
>>>>> https://lore.kernel.org/all/6d9e0f19-9851-4f23-a8b8-6acc82ae7a3d@baylibre.com/
>>>>>
>>>>> For some reason, the 2 first commits of the series were not applied
>>>>> with the dts. These commits are needed because they contain some
>>>>> definitions used by the dts.
>>>>>
>>>>> Julien
>>>>
>>>> I'm not sure how should I proceed here.
>>>>
>>>
>>> Reiterating, I'm sure how should I proceed.
>>>
>>> I'm removing those patches from mediatek for-next until further notice.
>>>
>>> Regards,
>>> Angelo
>>
>> Just for my information: Should we just wait for another maintainer
>> to pick the 2 missing patches ? Who is in charge of doing it ?
> 
> I've picked the 2 first patches but they are going through the validation process 
> through our CI. They will be available in a couple of days in linux-next.
> 
> If you want me to drop them and let them go through the Mediatek tree, just let me 
> know.
> 

Thanks but no, thanks :-)

Please, keep them in the thermal trees where they belong.
I will adjust accordingly.

Cheers,
Angelo

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ