[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <ac52515a-164c-4ce1-a930-f3b9ffc6df3a@intel.com>
Date: Wed, 19 Jun 2024 16:07:06 +0800
From: "Yang, Weijiang" <weijiang.yang@...el.com>
To: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@...gle.com>
CC: Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@...hat.com>, Paolo Bonzini
<pbonzini@...hat.com>, <kvm@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Hou Wenlong <houwenlong.hwl@...group.com>, Kechen Lu <kechenl@...dia.com>,
Oliver Upton <oliver.upton@...ux.dev>, Maxim Levitsky <mlevitsk@...hat.com>,
Binbin Wu <binbin.wu@...ux.intel.com>, Robert Hoo
<robert.hoo.linux@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 18/49] KVM: x86: Account for max supported CPUID leaf
when getting raw host CPUID
On 6/19/2024 2:17 PM, Yang, Weijiang wrote:
> On 5/18/2024 1:38 AM, Sean Christopherson wrote:
>
> [...]
>
>> /* Mask kvm_cpu_caps for @leaf with the raw CPUID capabilities of this CPU. */
>> static __always_inline void __kvm_cpu_cap_mask(unsigned int leaf)
>> {
>> const struct cpuid_reg cpuid = x86_feature_cpuid(leaf * 32);
>> - struct kvm_cpuid_entry2 entry;
>> reverse_cpuid_check(leaf);
>
> IIUC, this reverse_cpuid_check() is redundant since it's already enforced in x86_feature_cpuid() via __feature_leaf() as previous patch(17) shows.
Aha, I saw the function is removed in patch(23). Sorry for the noise.
>> - cpuid_count(cpuid.function, cpuid.index,
>> - &entry.eax, &entry.ebx, &entry.ecx, &entry.edx);
>> -
>> - kvm_cpu_caps[leaf] &= *__cpuid_entry_get_reg(&entry, cpuid.reg);
>> + kvm_cpu_caps[leaf] &= raw_cpuid_get(cpuid);
>> }
>> static __always_inline
>
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists