[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <2024061947-street-italics-0cdf@gregkh>
Date: Wed, 19 Jun 2024 10:12:51 +0200
From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To: Markus Elfring <Markus.Elfring@....de>
Cc: Jie Gan <quic_jiegan@...cinc.com>, coresight@...ts.linaro.org,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@...ux.intel.com>,
Konrad Dybcio <konradybcio@...il.com>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>,
Mathieu Poirier <mathieu.poirier@...aro.org>,
Mike Leach <mike.leach@...aro.org>, Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>,
Suzuki Poulouse <suzuki.poulose@....com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Bjorn Andersson <andersson@...nel.org>,
Jinlong Mao <quic_jinlmao@...cinc.com>,
Song Chai <quic_songchai@...cinc.com>,
Tao Zhang <quic_taozha@...cinc.com>,
Tingwei Zhang <quic_tingweiz@...cinc.com>,
Trilok Soni <quic_tsoni@...cinc.com>,
Yuanfang Zhang <quic_yuanfang@...cinc.com>, quic_liuxin@...cinc.com,
quic_sijiwu@...cinc.com, quic_xinlon@...cinc.com,
quic_xueqnie@...cinc.com, quic_yanzl@...cinc.com,
quic_yijiyang@...cinc.com, quic_yuanjiey@...cinc.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] coresight: Add coresight slave register driver to
support data filter function in sysfs mode
On Wed, Jun 19, 2024 at 09:55:25AM +0200, Markus Elfring wrote:
> …
> > +++ b/drivers/hwtracing/coresight/coresight-csr.c
> > @@ -0,0 +1,315 @@
> …
> > +static int __csr_set_etr_traceid(struct coresight_device *csdev,
> > + uint32_t atid_offset, uint32_t traceid,
> > + bool enable)
> > +{
> …
> > + spin_lock_irqsave(&drvdata->spin_lock, flags);
> > + CS_UNLOCK(drvdata->base);
> …
> > + CS_LOCK(drvdata->base);
> > + spin_unlock_irqrestore(&drvdata->spin_lock, flags);
> > + return 0;
> > +}
> …
>
> Would you become interested to apply a statement like “guard(spinlock_irqsave)(&drvdata->spin_lock);”?
> https://elixir.bootlin.com/linux/v6.10-rc4/source/include/linux/spinlock.h#L574
Hi,
This is the semi-friendly patch-bot of Greg Kroah-Hartman.
Markus, you seem to have sent a nonsensical or otherwise pointless
review comment to a patch submission on a Linux kernel developer mailing
list. I strongly suggest that you not do this anymore. Please do not
bother developers who are actively working to produce patches and
features with comments that, in the end, are a waste of time.
Patch submitter, please ignore Markus's suggestion; you do not need to
follow it at all. The person/bot/AI that sent it is being ignored by
almost all Linux kernel maintainers for having a persistent pattern of
behavior of producing distracting and pointless commentary, and
inability to adapt to feedback. Please feel free to also ignore emails
from them.
thanks,
greg k-h's patch email bot
Powered by blists - more mailing lists