[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID:
<IA1PR10MB7240896628D86A86E91DE9E798CF2@IA1PR10MB7240.namprd10.prod.outlook.com>
Date: Wed, 19 Jun 2024 08:21:35 +0000
From: Gulam Mohamed <gulam.mohamed@...cle.com>
To: Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>
CC: "linux-block@...r.kernel.org" <linux-block@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"yukuai1@...weicloud.com" <yukuai1@...weicloud.com>,
"axboe@...nel.dk"
<axboe@...nel.dk>
Subject: RE: [PATCH V6 for-6.11/block] loop: Fix a race between loop detach
and loop open
Hi Christoph,
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>
> Sent: Wednesday, June 19, 2024 1:46 PM
> To: Gulam Mohamed <gulam.mohamed@...cle.com>
> Cc: linux-block@...r.kernel.org; linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org;
> yukuai1@...weicloud.com; hch@....de; axboe@...nel.dk
> Subject: Re: [PATCH V6 for-6.11/block] loop: Fix a race between loop detach
> and loop open
>
> Do we need the re-addition of the open method to fix the ltp test case? I
> kinda hate it, but if that is what it takes:
>
I don't think its needed but I kept it because your following comment in the suggested change says " switch the state to roundown here to prevent new openers from coming in":
+ * Mark the device for removing the backing device on last close.
+ * If we are the only opener, also switch the state to roundown here to
+ * prevent new openers from coming in.
*/
Please suggest.
Regards,
Gulam Mohamed.
> Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists