linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v6 3/7] ASoC: codecs: wcd937x: add wcd937x codec driver

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date: Wed, 19 Jun 2024 16:32:44 +0530
From: Mohammad Rafi Shaik <quic_mohs@...cinc.com>
To: Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>,
        Christophe JAILLET
	<christophe.jaillet@...adoo.fr>
CC: Srinivas Kandagatla <srinivas.kandagatla@...aro.org>,
        Banajit Goswami
	<bgoswami@...cinc.com>,
        Liam Girdwood <lgirdwood@...il.com>, Rob Herring
	<robh@...nel.org>,
        Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@...nel.org>,
        Conor Dooley
	<conor+dt@...nel.org>, Jaroslav Kysela <perex@...ex.cz>,
        Takashi Iwai
	<tiwai@...e.com>, <alsa-devel@...a-project.org>,
        <linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-sound@...r.kernel.org>,
        <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        <quic_rohkumar@...cinc.com>, <quic_pkumpatl@...cinc.com>,
        Konrad Dybcio
	<konrad.dybcio@...aro.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 3/7] ASoC: codecs: wcd937x: add wcd937x codec driver

On 6/17/2024 5:25 PM, Mark Brown wrote:
> On Sun, Jun 16, 2024 at 04:54:58PM +0200, Christophe JAILLET wrote:
>> Le 11/06/2024 à 09:45, Mohammad Rafi Shaik a écrit :
> 
>>> +static void wcd937x_soc_codec_remove(struct snd_soc_component *component)
>>> +{
>>> +	struct wcd937x_priv *wcd937x = snd_soc_component_get_drvdata(component);
>>> +
>>> +	wcd937x_mbhc_deinit(component);
>>> +	free_irq(wcd937x->aux_pdm_wd_int, wcd937x);
>>> +	free_irq(wcd937x->hphl_pdm_wd_int, wcd937x);
>>> +	free_irq(wcd937x->hphr_pdm_wd_int, wcd937x);
> 
>> These irq have been requested wth devm_request_threaded_irq(), so either
>> this free_irq should be removed, or devm_free_irq() should be used if the
>> order is important.
> 
> Yes, this should be fixed.

okay, will check and provide the fix.


Thanks & Regards,
Rafi.