lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <ZnLKSEzKBTXYvOMe@pathway.suse.cz>
Date: Wed, 19 Jun 2024 14:08:40 +0200
From: Petr Mladek <pmladek@...e.com>
To: Tony Lindgren <tony.lindgren@...ux.intel.com>
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
	Jiri Slaby <jirislaby@...nel.org>,
	Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
	John Ogness <john.ogness@...utronix.de>,
	Sergey Senozhatsky <senozhatsky@...omium.org>,
	Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>,
	Tony Lindgren <tony@...mide.com>,
	Ilpo Järvinen <ilpo.jarvinen@...ux.intel.com>,
	linux-serial@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 3/3] serial: core: Rename preferred console handling
 for match and update

On Wed 2024-06-19 10:17:46, Tony Lindgren wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 19, 2024 at 07:39:04AM +0300, Tony Lindgren wrote:
> > On Tue, Jun 18, 2024 at 03:51:44PM +0200, Petr Mladek wrote:
> > > It seems to try whether c->devname matches a number "X", or "ttySX".
> > > It even tries the sparc-specific transformations in
> > > serial_base_add_sparc_console()
> > > 
> > > But this is the original format which does _not_ include ":".
> > > It never will be stored in c->devname and will never match.
> > 
> > Good catch, this won't do anything now with console_setup()
> > checking for ":" for deferred consoles. So we should revert commit
> > a0f32e2dd998 ("serial: core: Handle serial console options").
> 
> Heh actually we can revert a lot more, basically leaving only
> the renamed serial_base_match_and_update_preferred_console().

I wonder if it would be cleaner to revert all patches adding
the feature and then add back just the minimalist solution.

Best Regards,
Petr

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ