[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <867celjfng.wl-maz@kernel.org>
Date: Wed, 19 Jun 2024 13:11:47 +0100
From: Marc Zyngier <maz@...nel.org>
To: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@...wei.com>
Cc: Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>,
"Catalin\
Marinas" <catalin.marinas@....com>,
<linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org>,
<linux-arch@...r.kernel.org>,
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
<linux-pm@...r.kernel.org>,
<linuxarm@...wei.com>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
<loongarch@...ts.linux.dev>,
<x86@...nel.org>,
Russell King <linux@...linux.org.uk>,
"Rafael J . Wysocki"
<rafael@...nel.org>,
"Miguel Luis" <miguel.luis@...cle.com>,
James Morse
<james.morse@....com>,
"Salil Mehta" <salil.mehta@...wei.com>,
Jean-Philippe
Brucker <jean-philippe@...aro.org>,
Hanjun Guo <guohanjun@...wei.com>,
Gavin
Shan <gshan@...hat.com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
Borislav Petkov
<bp@...en8.de>,
Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>,
<justin.he@....com>,
<jianyong.wu@....com>,
Karl Heubaum
<karl.heubaum@...cle.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v10 00/19] ACPI/arm64: add support for virtual cpu hotplug
On Thu, 13 Jun 2024 11:25:27 +0100,
Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@...wei.com> wrote:
>
> On Wed, 29 May 2024 14:34:27 +0100
> Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@...wei.com> wrote:
>
> > v10:
> > - Make acpi_processor_set_per_cpu() return 0 / error rather than bool
> > to simplify error handling at the call sites.
> > (Thanks to both Rafael and Gavin who commented on this)
> > - Gather tags.
> > - Rebase on v6.10-rc1
> >
> > The approach to the GICv3 changes stablized very late in the 6.10 cycle.
> > Subject to Marc taking a final look at those, I think we are now
> > in a good state wrt to those and the ACPI parts. The remaining code
> > that hasn't received review tags from the relevant maintainers
> > is the arm64 specific arch_register_cpu(). Given I think this will go
> > through the arm64 tree, hopefully they have just been waiting for
> > everything else to be ready.
>
> Marc, Will, Catalin,
>
> Any comments on this series? We definitely want to finally land this
> in 6.11!
>
> Marc, in practice I think you already gave feedback on the the GICv3
> changes in here as part of the discussions in the earlier version threads,
> but if you have time for a final glance through it would be much appreciated.
> Thanks for all your earlier help on this btw.
I've had a quick look and the GICv3 parts look OK to me (you should
now have by tags for both patches).
Thanks,
M.
--
Without deviation from the norm, progress is not possible.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists