linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v10 00/19] ACPI/arm64: add support for virtual cpu hotplug

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date: Wed, 19 Jun 2024 13:11:47 +0100
From: Marc Zyngier <maz@...nel.org>
To: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@...wei.com>
Cc: Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>,
	"Catalin\
 Marinas" <catalin.marinas@....com>,
	<linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org>,
	<linux-arch@...r.kernel.org>,
	<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
	<linux-pm@...r.kernel.org>,
	<linuxarm@...wei.com>,
	Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
	<loongarch@...ts.linux.dev>,
	<x86@...nel.org>,
	Russell King <linux@...linux.org.uk>,
	"Rafael J . Wysocki"
	<rafael@...nel.org>,
	"Miguel Luis" <miguel.luis@...cle.com>,
	James Morse
	<james.morse@....com>,
	"Salil Mehta" <salil.mehta@...wei.com>,
	Jean-Philippe
 Brucker <jean-philippe@...aro.org>,
	Hanjun Guo <guohanjun@...wei.com>,
	Gavin
 Shan <gshan@...hat.com>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
	Borislav Petkov
	<bp@...en8.de>,
	Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>,
	<justin.he@....com>,
	<jianyong.wu@....com>,
	Karl Heubaum
	<karl.heubaum@...cle.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v10 00/19] ACPI/arm64: add support for virtual cpu hotplug

On Thu, 13 Jun 2024 11:25:27 +0100,
Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@...wei.com> wrote:
> 
> On Wed, 29 May 2024 14:34:27 +0100
> Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@...wei.com> wrote:
> 
> > v10:
> > - Make acpi_processor_set_per_cpu() return 0 / error rather than bool
> >   to simplify error handling at the call sites.
> >   (Thanks to both Rafael and Gavin who commented on this)
> > - Gather tags.
> > - Rebase on v6.10-rc1
> > 
> > The approach to the GICv3 changes stablized very late in the 6.10 cycle.
> > Subject to Marc taking a final look at those, I think we are now
> > in a good state wrt to those and the ACPI parts. The remaining code
> > that hasn't received review tags from the relevant maintainers
> > is the arm64 specific arch_register_cpu().  Given I think this will go
> > through the arm64 tree, hopefully they have just been waiting for
> > everything else to be ready.
> 
> Marc, Will, Catalin,
> 
> Any comments on this series?  We definitely want to finally land this
> in 6.11!
> 
> Marc, in practice I think you already gave feedback on the the GICv3
> changes in here as part of the discussions in the earlier version threads,
> but if you have time for a final glance through it would be much appreciated.
> Thanks for all your earlier help on this btw.

I've had a quick look and the GICv3 parts look OK to me (you should
now have by tags for both patches).

Thanks,

	M.

-- 
Without deviation from the norm, progress is not possible.