linux-kernel - Re: [v11 3/7] iio: core: Add new DMABUF interface infrastructure

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <15edbedcac80961ec9b7834041e54143657cd48b.camel@crapouillou.net>
Date: Wed, 19 Jun 2024 14:21:55 +0200
From: Paul Cercueil <paul@...pouillou.net>
To: Markus Elfring <Markus.Elfring@....de>, lkp@...el.com, Nuno
 Sá <nuno.sa@...log.com>, linux-iio@...r.kernel.org,
 dmaengine@...r.kernel.org,  linux-media@...r.kernel.org,
 dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org,  linaro-mm-sig@...ts.linaro.org, Christian
 König <christian.koenig@....com>, Jonathan Cameron
 <jic23@...nel.org>, Lars-Peter Clausen <lars@...afoo.de>, Sumit Semwal
 <sumit.semwal@...aro.org>, Vinod Koul <vkoul@...nel.org>
Cc: oe-kbuild-all@...ts.linux.dev, LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, 
	linux-doc@...r.kernel.org, Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>, Randy Dunlap
	 <rdunlap@...radead.org>
Subject: Re: [v11 3/7] iio: core: Add new DMABUF interface infrastructure

Le mercredi 19 juin 2024 à 13:56 +0200, Markus Elfring a écrit :
> …
> > https://lore.kernel.org/linux-iio/219abc43b4fdd4a13b307ed2efaa0e6869e68e3f.camel@gmail.com/T/#eefd360069c4261aec9621fafde30924706571c94
> > 
> > (and responses below)
> > 
> > It's more nuanced than I remembered.
> …
> 
> 
> > > * Will the desire grow for further collateral evolution according
> > > to
> > >   affected software components?
> > 
> > Not sure what you mean by that.
> 
> Advanced programming interfaces were added a while ago.
> 
> Example:
> https://elixir.bootlin.com/linux/v6.10-rc4/source/include/linux/cleanup.h#L8
> 
> Corresponding attempts for increasing API usage need to adapt to
> remaining change reluctance,
> don't they?

Sure, I guess.

But that does not change the fact that I cannot use cleanup.h magic in
this patchset, yet, as the required changes would have to be done in a
separate one.

Cheers,
-Paul