[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20240619130115.2799118-1-csokas.bence@prolan.hu>
Date: Wed, 19 Jun 2024 15:01:16 +0200
From: Csókás, Bence <csokas.bence@...lan.hu>
To: Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@...tlin.com>,
<linux-rtc@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
CC: Csókás, Bence <csokas.bence@...lan.hu>
Subject: [PATCH resubmit] rtc: interface: Add RTC offset to alarm after fix-up
`rtc_add_offset()` is called by `__rtc_read_time()`
and `__rtc_read_alarm()` to add the RTC's offset to
the raw read-outs from the device drivers. However,
in the latter case, a fix-up algorithm is run if
the RTC device does not report a full `struct rtc_time`
alarm value. In that case, the offset was forgot to be
added.
Fixes: fd6792bb022e ("rtc: fix alarm read and set offset")
Signed-off-by: Csókás, Bence <csokas.bence@...lan.hu>
---
drivers/rtc/interface.c | 5 +++--
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/rtc/interface.c b/drivers/rtc/interface.c
index 1b63111cdda2..db8dffffed91 100644
--- a/drivers/rtc/interface.c
+++ b/drivers/rtc/interface.c
@@ -273,12 +273,11 @@ int __rtc_read_alarm(struct rtc_device *rtc, struct rtc_wkalrm *alarm)
if (err)
return err;
/* full-function RTCs won't have such missing fields */
if (rtc_valid_tm(&alarm->time) == 0) {
- rtc_add_offset(rtc, &alarm->time);
- return 0;
+ goto done;
}
/* get the "after" timestamp, to detect wrapped fields */
err = rtc_read_time(rtc, &now);
if (err < 0)
@@ -378,10 +377,12 @@ int __rtc_read_alarm(struct rtc_device *rtc, struct rtc_wkalrm *alarm)
done:
if (err && alarm->enabled)
dev_warn(&rtc->dev, "invalid alarm value: %ptR\n",
&alarm->time);
+ rtc_add_offset(rtc, &alarm->time);
+
return err;
}
int rtc_read_alarm(struct rtc_device *rtc, struct rtc_wkalrm *alarm)
{
--
2.34.1
Powered by blists - more mailing lists