linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] spi: cs42l43: Refactor accessing the SDCA extension properties

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date: Wed, 19 Jun 2024 14:47:25 +0100
From: Charles Keepax <ckeepax@...nsource.cirrus.com>
To: Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
CC: <linux-spi@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        <patches@...nsource.cirrus.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] spi: cs42l43: Refactor accessing the SDCA
 extension properties

On Wed, Jun 19, 2024 at 02:40:04PM +0100, Charles Keepax wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 19, 2024 at 02:30:33PM +0100, Mark Brown wrote:
> > On Wed, Jun 19, 2024 at 02:26:36PM +0100, Charles Keepax wrote:
> > > On Wed, Jun 19, 2024 at 01:50:48PM +0100, Mark Brown wrote:
> > 
> > > > [1/2] spi: cs42l43: Refactor accessing the SDCA extension properties
> > > >       commit: 6914ee9cd1b0c91bd2fb4dbe204947c3c31259e1
> > > > [2/2] spi: cs42l43: Add speaker id support to the bridge configuration
> > > >       (no commit info)
> > 
> > > Not sure all went smoothly here. This seems to have picked up v1
> > > of the first patch and not picked up the second one.
> > 
> > That's because when I told you that the second patch didn't apply I left
> > the other one in the queue, and what you sent now didn't apply either.
> 
> Hmm... what branch are you applying this to? Pulling the patch
> off the list and git am-ing it onto your spi for-next branch
> works fine for me.
> 
> I mean I can just resend it but presumably we will hit the same
> issue again.
> 

Ah I see I think your applying to the for-6.11 branch, which is
missing 60980cf5b8c8 ("spi: cs42l43: Drop cs35l56 SPI speed down
to 11MHz"). I can send a version based not on that but might make
a bit of an annoying merge conflict later?

Thanks,
Charles