linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] ASoC: cs35l56: Accept values greater than 0 as IRQ numbers

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <171880502423.147445.2048207564281092382.b4-ty@kernel.org>
Date: Wed, 19 Jun 2024 14:50:24 +0100
From: Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
To: Simon Trimmer <simont@...nsource.cirrus.com>
Cc: linux-sound@...r.kernel.org, alsa-devel@...a-project.org, 
 linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, patches@...nsource.cirrus.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ASoC: cs35l56: Accept values greater than 0 as IRQ
 numbers

On Mon, 17 Jun 2024 14:53:38 +0100, Simon Trimmer wrote:
> IRQ lookup functions such as those in ACPI can return error values when
> an IRQ is not defined. The i2c core driver converts the error codes to a
> value of 0 and the SPI bus driver passes them unaltered to client device
> drivers.
> 
> The cs35l56 driver should only accept positive non-zero values as IRQ
> numbers.
> 
> [...]

Applied to

   https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/broonie/sound.git for-next

Thanks!

[1/1] ASoC: cs35l56: Accept values greater than 0 as IRQ numbers
      commit: 3ec1428d7b7c519d757a013cef908d7e33dee882

All being well this means that it will be integrated into the linux-next
tree (usually sometime in the next 24 hours) and sent to Linus during
the next merge window (or sooner if it is a bug fix), however if
problems are discovered then the patch may be dropped or reverted.

You may get further e-mails resulting from automated or manual testing
and review of the tree, please engage with people reporting problems and
send followup patches addressing any issues that are reported if needed.

If any updates are required or you are submitting further changes they
should be sent as incremental updates against current git, existing
patches will not be replaced.

Please add any relevant lists and maintainers to the CCs when replying
to this mail.

Thanks,
Mark