[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20240619135143.kr2tx4ynxayc5v3a@bogus>
Date: Wed, 19 Jun 2024 14:51:43 +0100
From: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@....com>
To: Elliot Berman <quic_eberman@...cinc.com>
Cc: Bjorn Andersson <andersson@...nel.org>,
Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@....com>,
Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@...aro.org>,
Sebastian Reichel <sre@...nel.org>, Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>,
Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>, Vinod Koul <vkoul@...nel.org>,
Andy Yan <andy.yan@...k-chips.com>,
Lorenzo Pieralisi <lpieralisi@...nel.org>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
Bartosz Golaszewski <bartosz.golaszewski@...aro.org>,
Satya Durga Srinivasu Prabhala <quic_satyap@...cinc.com>,
Melody Olvera <quic_molvera@...cinc.com>,
Shivendra Pratap <quic_spratap@...cinc.com>,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
Florian Fainelli <florian.fainelli@...adcom.com>,
linux-pm@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 3/4] firmware: psci: Read and use vendor reset types
On Mon, Jun 17, 2024 at 10:18:09AM -0700, Elliot Berman wrote:
> SoC vendors have different types of resets and are controlled through
> various registers. For instance, Qualcomm chipsets can reboot to a
> "download mode" that allows a RAM dump to be collected. Another example
> is they also support writing a cookie that can be read by bootloader
> during next boot. PSCI offers a mechanism, SYSTEM_RESET2, for these
> vendor reset types to be implemented without requiring drivers for every
> register/cookie.
>
> Add support in PSCI to statically map reboot mode commands from
> userspace to a vendor reset and cookie value using the device tree.
>
> A separate initcall is needed to parse the devicetree, instead of using
> psci_dt_init because mm isn't sufficiently set up to allocate memory.
>
> Reboot mode framework is close but doesn't quite fit with the
> design and requirements for PSCI SYSTEM_RESET2. Some of these issues can
> be solved but doesn't seem reasonable in sum:
> 1. reboot mode registers against the reboot_notifier_list, which is too
> early to call SYSTEM_RESET2. PSCI would need to remember the reset
> type from the reboot-mode framework callback and use it
> psci_sys_reset.
> 2. reboot mode assumes only one cookie/parameter is described in the
> device tree. SYSTEM_RESET2 uses 2: one for the type and one for
> cookie.
> 3. psci cpuidle driver already registers a driver against the
> arm,psci-1.0 compatible. Refactoring would be needed to have both a
> cpuidle and reboot-mode driver.
>
I need to think through it but when you first introduced the generic
Documentation/devicetree/bindings/power/reset/reboot-mode.yaml bindings
I also looked at drivers/power/reset/reboot-mode.c
I assumed this extension to that binding would reuse the same and
PSCI would just do reboot_mode_register(). I didn't expect to see these
changes. I might have missing something but since the bindings is still
quite generic with additional cells that act as additional cookie for
reboot call, I still think that should be possible.
What am I missing here then ?
--
Regards,
Sudeep
Powered by blists - more mailing lists