lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <39d1c5e1-e27b-4736-87e0-ca42ccf8885a@linaro.org>
Date: Wed, 19 Jun 2024 16:06:51 +0200
From: Neil Armstrong <neil.armstrong@...aro.org>
To: Christian Hewitt <christianshewitt@...il.com>,
 kernel test robot <lkp@...el.com>
Cc: Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>, Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@...nel.org>,
 Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>, Kevin Hilman <khilman@...libre.com>,
 Jerome Brunet <jbrunet@...libre.com>,
 Martin Blumenstingl <martin.blumenstingl@...glemail.com>,
 devicetree <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
 linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, AML
 <linux-amlogic@...ts.infradead.org>, LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
 oe-kbuild-all@...ts.linux.dev
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3] arm64: dts: meson: add initial support for Dreambox
 One/Two

On 07/06/2024 10:31, Christian Hewitt wrote:
>> On 7 Jun 2024, at 12:10 PM, kernel test robot <lkp@...el.com> wrote:
>>
>> Hi Christian,
>>
>> kernel test robot noticed the following build warnings:
>>
>> [auto build test WARNING on robh/for-next]
>> [also build test WARNING on krzk/for-next linus/master v6.10-rc2 next-20240606]
>> [cannot apply to krzk-dt/for-next krzk-mem-ctrl/for-next]
>> [If your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, kindly drop us a note.
>> And when submitting patch, we suggest to use '--base' as documented in
>> https://git-scm.com/docs/git-format-patch#_base_tree_information]
>>
>> url:    https://github.com/intel-lab-lkp/linux/commits/Christian-Hewitt/dt-bindings-arm-amlogic-add-support-for-Dreambox-One-Two/20240606-175427
>> base:   https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/robh/linux.git for-next
>> patch link:    https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240606094513.3949323-3-christianshewitt%40gmail.com
>> patch subject: [PATCH 3/3] arm64: dts: meson: add initial support for Dreambox One/Two
>> compiler: clang version 19.0.0git (https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project d7d2d4f53fc79b4b58e8d8d08151b577c3699d4a)
>> dtschema version: 2024.6.dev1+g833054f
>> reproduce: (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20240607/202406071527.fnfhnkUL-lkp@intel.com/reproduce)
>>
>> If you fix the issue in a separate patch/commit (i.e. not just a new version of
>> the same patch/commit), kindly add following tags
>> | Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@...el.com>
>> | Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202406071527.fnfhnkUL-lkp@intel.com/
>>
>> dtcheck warnings: (new ones prefixed by >>)
>>    arch/arm64/boot/dts/amlogic/meson-g12-common.dtsi:266.33-1540.7: Warning (unit_address_vs_reg): /soc/bus@...00000/bus@...00/pinctrl@40: node has a unit name, but no reg or ranges property
>>      also defined at arch/arm64/boot/dts/amlogic/meson-g12-common.dtsi:266.33-1540.7
>>    arch/arm64/boot/dts/amlogic/meson-g12-common.dtsi:266.33-1540.7: Warning (simple_bus_reg): /soc/bus@...00000/bus@...00/pinctrl@40: missing or empty reg/ranges property
>>      also defined at arch/arm64/boot/dts/amlogic/meson-g12-common.dtsi:266.33-1540.7
>>    arch/arm64/boot/dts/amlogic/meson-g12-common.dtsi:2220.23-2260.6: Warning (avoid_unnecessary_addr_size): /soc/bus@...00000/dsi@...0: unnecessary #address-cells/#size-cells without "ranges" or child "reg" property
>>      also defined at arch/arm64/boot/dts/amlogic/meson-g12-common.dtsi:2220.23-2260.6
>>>> arch/arm64/boot/dts/amlogic/meson-g12b-dreambox-one.dtb: /soc/bus@...00000/bus@...00/clock-controller@0: failed to match any schema with compatible: ['amlogic,g12a-audio-clkc']
>>    arch/arm64/boot/dts/amlogic/meson-g12b-dreambox-one.dtb: /soc/bus@...00000/bus@...00/audio-controller@744: failed to match any schema with compatible: ['amlogic,g12a-tohdmitx']
>>>> arch/arm64/boot/dts/amlogic/meson-g12b-dreambox-one.dtb: sys-ctrl@0: '#address-cells', '#size-cells', 'ranges' do not match any of the regexes: 'pinctrl-[0-9]+'
>>     from schema $id: http://devicetree.org/schemas/soc/amlogic/amlogic,meson-gx-hhi-sysctrl.yaml#
>> --
>>    arch/arm64/boot/dts/amlogic/meson-g12-common.dtsi:266.33-1540.7: Warning (unit_address_vs_reg): /soc/bus@...00000/bus@...00/pinctrl@40: node has a unit name, but no reg or ranges property
>>      also defined at arch/arm64/boot/dts/amlogic/meson-g12-common.dtsi:266.33-1540.7
>>    arch/arm64/boot/dts/amlogic/meson-g12-common.dtsi:266.33-1540.7: Warning (simple_bus_reg): /soc/bus@...00000/bus@...00/pinctrl@40: missing or empty reg/ranges property
>>      also defined at arch/arm64/boot/dts/amlogic/meson-g12-common.dtsi:266.33-1540.7
>>    arch/arm64/boot/dts/amlogic/meson-g12-common.dtsi:2220.23-2260.6: Warning (avoid_unnecessary_addr_size): /soc/bus@...00000/dsi@...0: unnecessary #address-cells/#size-cells without "ranges" or child "reg" property
>>      also defined at arch/arm64/boot/dts/amlogic/meson-g12-common.dtsi:2220.23-2260.6
>>>> arch/arm64/boot/dts/amlogic/meson-g12b-dreambox-two.dtb: /soc/bus@...00000/bus@...00/clock-controller@0: failed to match any schema with compatible: ['amlogic,g12a-audio-clkc']
>>    arch/arm64/boot/dts/amlogic/meson-g12b-dreambox-two.dtb: /soc/bus@...00000/bus@...00/audio-controller@744: failed to match any schema with compatible: ['amlogic,g12a-tohdmitx']
>>>> arch/arm64/boot/dts/amlogic/meson-g12b-dreambox-two.dtb: sys-ctrl@0: '#address-cells', '#size-cells', 'ranges' do not match any of the regexes: 'pinctrl-[0-9]+'
>>     from schema $id: http://devicetree.org/schemas/soc/amlogic/amlogic,meson-gx-hhi-sysctrl.yaml#
> 
> Nothing to fix. The patch just depends on Neil’s binding fixes here:
> 
> https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/linux-amlogic/cover/20240606-topic-amlogic-upstream-bindings-fixes-dts-v1-0-62e812729541@linaro.org/

Can you resent but keeping the assigned-clocks in the sound card node ?

BTW keep the reviewed-by.

Thanks,
Neil

> 
> Christian
> 


Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ