lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket
[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Thu, 20 Jun 2024 16:54:39 +0100
From: Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
To: Mike Rapoport <rppt@...nel.org>
Cc: James Gowans <jgowans@...zon.com>, Jan Beulich <jbeulich@...e.com>,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Linux Next Mailing List <linux-next@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: linux-next: manual merge of the memblock tree with the origin tree

Hi all,

Today's linux-next merge of the memblock tree got a conflict in:

  mm/memblock.c

between commit:

  e0eec24e2e199 ("memblock: make memblock_set_node() also warn about use of MAX_NUMNODES")

from the origin tree and commit:

  94ff46de4a738 ("memblock: Move late alloc warning down to phys alloc")

from the memblock tree.

I fixed it up (see below) and can carry the fix as necessary. This
is now fixed as far as linux-next is concerned, but any non trivial
conflicts should be mentioned to your upstream maintainer when your tree
is submitted for merging.  You may also want to consider cooperating
with the maintainer of the conflicting tree to minimise any particularly
complex conflicts.

diff --cc mm/memblock.c
index e81fb68f7f888,692dc551c0fde..0000000000000
--- a/mm/memblock.c
+++ b/mm/memblock.c
@@@ -1441,6 -1446,20 +1439,9 @@@ phys_addr_t __init memblock_alloc_range
  	enum memblock_flags flags = choose_memblock_flags();
  	phys_addr_t found;
  
+ 	if (WARN_ONCE(nid == MAX_NUMNODES, "Usage of MAX_NUMNODES is deprecated. Use NUMA_NO_NODE instead\n"))
+ 		nid = NUMA_NO_NODE;
+ 
 -	/*
 -	 * Detect any accidental use of these APIs after slab is ready, as at
 -	 * this moment memblock may be deinitialized already and its
 -	 * internal data may be destroyed (after execution of memblock_free_all)
 -	 */
 -	if (WARN_ON_ONCE(slab_is_available())) {
 -		void *vaddr = kzalloc_node(size, GFP_NOWAIT, nid);
 -
 -		return vaddr ? virt_to_phys(vaddr) : 0;
 -	}
 -
  	if (!align) {
  		/* Can't use WARNs this early in boot on powerpc */
  		dump_stack();

Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (489 bytes)

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ