[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20240620-opal-reopen-f2aeffc9b041@spud>
Date: Thu, 20 Jun 2024 17:12:24 +0100
From: Conor Dooley <conor@...nel.org>
To: Chen-Yu Tsai <wenst@...omium.org>
Cc: Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>, Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>,
Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>,
Matthias Brugger <matthias.bgg@...il.com>,
AngeloGioacchino Del Regno <angelogioacchino.delregno@...labora.com>,
Hsin-Hsiung Wang <hsin-hsiung.wang@...iatek.com>,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-mediatek@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] dt-bindings: regulator: mt6315: Document MT6319 PMIC
On Thu, Jun 20, 2024 at 05:47:36PM +0800, Chen-Yu Tsai wrote:
> The MT6319 is a pin-compatible drop-in replacement for MT6315 with
> slightly better electrical characteristics.
>
> It's unclear whether there are any differences, since the downstream
> implementation doesn't describe the MT6319 separately. Neither does the
> implementation check chip IDs, even though those are available.
>
> Add a new compatible for the MT6319 just in case differences are
> discovered later and fall back to the MT6315 compatible.
>
> Signed-off-by: Chen-Yu Tsai <wenst@...omium.org>
Reviewed-by: Conor Dooley <conor.dooley@...rochip.com>
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (229 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists