lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Thu, 20 Jun 2024 17:30:48 +0100
From: "Jiaxun Yang" <jiaxun.yang@...goat.com>
To: "Thomas Bogendoerfer" <tsbogend@...ha.franken.de>
Cc: "Jonas Gorski" <jonas.gorski@...il.com>,
 "Maciej W. Rozycki" <macro@...am.me.uk>,
 "linux-mips@...r.kernel.org" <linux-mips@...r.kernel.org>,
 linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/4] MIPS: Introduce config options for LLSC availability



在2024年6月20日六月 下午5:06,Thomas Bogendoerfer写道:
[...]
> do you have an user manual stating that the R5k bug is fixed on this CPUs ?

I actually investigated R5500 a little bit.

There is no explicit document mentioned this bug is fixed on R5500, but it's not
mentioned on "VR Series 64-/32-Bit Microprocessor Programming Guide" [1] either,
while some other hardware limitations are mentioned in that guide.

Plus EMMA platform, which was removed form the kernel, doesn't have
cpu-feature-overrides.h. This means that the platform was running with LLSC
enabled.

So I think this CPU is not affected.

[1]: https://repo.oss.cipunited.com/archives/docs/NEC/U10710EJ5V0AN00.pdf
>
> Thomas.
>
> -- 
> Crap can work. Given enough thrust pigs will fly, but it's not necessarily a
> good idea.                                                [ RFC1925, 2.3 ]

-- 
- Jiaxun

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ