linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 1/2] cpufreq_schedutil: Refactor sugov_cpu_is

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <ZnRwIWgZuvPupJK-@slm.duckdns.org>
Date: Thu, 20 Jun 2024 08:08:33 -1000
From: Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
To: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>
Cc: viresh.kumar@...aro.org, linux-pm@...r.kernel.org, void@...ifault.com,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, kernel-team@...a.com,
	mingo@...hat.com, peterz@...radead.org,
	David Vernet <dvernet@...a.com>,
	"Rafael J . Wysocki" <rafael.j.wysocki@...el.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] cpufreq_schedutil: Refactor sugov_cpu_is_busy()

Hello, Rafael.

On Thu, Jun 20, 2024 at 07:57:47PM +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> Please feel free to pick up the $subject patch (with my ACK).

Will do. Thanks.

> As for the [2/2], I don't think I'm sufficiently familiar with the
> scx_* stuff to make any comments on it, either way.

Yeah, as long as the cpufreq part isn't objectionable to you, it's all good.

Thank you.

-- 
tejun