lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <19cb366a-e6d8-4608-98c9-0fad389363ee@app.fastmail.com>
Date: Fri, 21 Jun 2024 09:17:27 +1200
From: "Luke Jones" <luke@...nes.dev>
To: "Devin Bayer" <dev@...bly.so>, corentin.chary@...il.com
Cc: "Hans de Goede" <hdegoede@...hat.com>,
 platform-driver-x86@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
 linux-api@...r.kernel.org,
 Ilpo Järvinen <ilpo.jarvinen@...ux.intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] platform/x86: asus-wmi: support newer fan_boost_mode dev_id

On Thu, 20 Jun 2024, at 8:22 PM, Devin Bayer wrote:
> Support changing the fan mode (silent, performance, standard). I reused
> the existing fan_boost_mode sysfs entry.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Devin Bayer <dev@...bly.so>
> ---
> drivers/platform/x86/asus-wmi.c            | 87 ++++++++++++++++++++--
> include/linux/platform_data/x86/asus-wmi.h |  1 +
> 2 files changed, 82 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/platform/x86/asus-wmi.c b/drivers/platform/x86/asus-wmi.c
> index 5585f15e7920..e27b8f86d57b 100644
> --- a/drivers/platform/x86/asus-wmi.c
> +++ b/drivers/platform/x86/asus-wmi.c
> @@ -73,7 +73,6 @@ module_param(fnlock_default, bool, 0444);
> #define NOTIFY_LID_FLIP_ROG 0xbd
>  
> #define ASUS_WMI_FNLOCK_BIOS_DISABLED BIT(0)
> -#define ASUS_WMI_DEVID_CAMERA_LED 0x00060079

Be careful not to introduce extraneous changes.

>  
> #define ASUS_MID_FAN_DESC "mid_fan"
> #define ASUS_GPU_FAN_DESC "gpu_fan"
> @@ -94,6 +93,10 @@ module_param(fnlock_default, bool, 0444);
> #define ASUS_FAN_BOOST_MODE_SILENT_MASK 0x02
> #define ASUS_FAN_BOOST_MODES_MASK 0x03
>  
> +#define ASUS_FAN_BOOST_MODE2_NORMAL 0
> +#define ASUS_FAN_BOOST_MODE2_SILENT 1
> +#define ASUS_FAN_BOOST_MODE2_OVERBOOST 2
> +
> #define ASUS_THROTTLE_THERMAL_POLICY_DEFAULT 0
> #define ASUS_THROTTLE_THERMAL_POLICY_OVERBOOST 1
> #define ASUS_THROTTLE_THERMAL_POLICY_SILENT 2
> @@ -268,6 +271,7 @@ struct asus_wmi {
> int agfn_pwm;
>  
> bool fan_boost_mode_available;
> + u32 fan_boost_mode_dev_id;
> u8 fan_boost_mode_mask;
> u8 fan_boost_mode;
>  
> @@ -3019,14 +3023,14 @@ static int asus_wmi_fan_init(struct asus_wmi *asus)
>  
> /* Fan mode *******************************************************************/
>  
> -static int fan_boost_mode_check_present(struct asus_wmi *asus)
> +static int fan_boost_mode1_check_present(struct asus_wmi *asus)
> {
> u32 result;
> int err;
>  
> - asus->fan_boost_mode_available = false;
> + asus->fan_boost_mode_dev_id = ASUS_WMI_DEVID_FAN_BOOST_MODE;
>  
> - err = asus_wmi_get_devstate(asus, ASUS_WMI_DEVID_FAN_BOOST_MODE,
> + err = asus_wmi_get_devstate(asus, asus->fan_boost_mode_dev_id,
>     &result);
> if (err) {
> if (err == -ENODEV)
> @@ -3044,16 +3048,87 @@ static int fan_boost_mode_check_present(struct asus_wmi *asus)
> return 0;
> }
>  
> +static int fan_boost_mode2_check_present(struct asus_wmi *asus)
> +{
> + u32 result;
> + int err;
> +
> + asus->fan_boost_mode_mask = ASUS_FAN_BOOST_MODES_MASK;
> + asus->fan_boost_mode_dev_id = ASUS_WMI_DEVID_FAN_BOOST_MODE2;
> +
> + err = asus_wmi_get_devstate(asus, ASUS_WMI_DEVID_FAN_BOOST_MODE2,
> +     &result);
> + if (err) {
> + if (err == -ENODEV)
> + return 0;
> + else
> + return err;
> + }
> +
> + if (! (result & ASUS_WMI_DSTS_PRESENCE_BIT))
> + return 0;
> +
> + asus->fan_boost_mode_available = true;
> +
> + if (result & ASUS_FAN_BOOST_MODE2_SILENT) {
> + asus->fan_boost_mode = ASUS_FAN_BOOST_MODE_SILENT;
> + } else if(result & ASUS_FAN_BOOST_MODE2_OVERBOOST) {
> + asus->fan_boost_mode = ASUS_FAN_BOOST_MODE_OVERBOOST;
> + } else {
> + asus->fan_boost_mode = ASUS_FAN_BOOST_MODE_NORMAL;
> + }
> +
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> +static int fan_boost_mode_check_present(struct asus_wmi *asus)
> +{
> + int err;
> +
> + asus->fan_boost_mode_available = false;
> +
> + err = fan_boost_mode1_check_present(asus);
> + if (err)
> + return err;
> +
> + if (!asus->fan_boost_mode_available) {
> + err = fan_boost_mode2_check_present(asus);
> + }
> +
> + return err;
> +}
> +
> static int fan_boost_mode_write(struct asus_wmi *asus)
> {
> u32 retval;
> u8 value;
> + u8 hw_value;
> int err;
>  
> value = asus->fan_boost_mode;
>  
> - pr_info("Set fan boost mode: %u\n", value);
> - err = asus_wmi_set_devstate(ASUS_WMI_DEVID_FAN_BOOST_MODE, value,
> + /* transform userspace values into hardware values */
> + if(asus->fan_boost_mode_dev_id == ASUS_WMI_DEVID_FAN_BOOST_MODE2) {
> + switch(value) {
> + case ASUS_FAN_BOOST_MODE_SILENT:
> + hw_value = ASUS_FAN_BOOST_MODE2_SILENT;
> + break;
> + case ASUS_FAN_BOOST_MODE_OVERBOOST:
> + hw_value = ASUS_FAN_BOOST_MODE2_OVERBOOST;
> + break;
> + case ASUS_FAN_BOOST_MODE_NORMAL:
> + hw_value = ASUS_FAN_BOOST_MODE2_NORMAL;
> + break;
> + default:
> + return -EINVAL;
> +
> + }
> + } else {
> + hw_value = value;
> + }
> +
> + pr_info("Set fan boost mode: user=%u hw=%u\n", value, hw_value);
> + err = asus_wmi_set_devstate(asus->fan_boost_mode_dev_id, hw_value,
>     &retval);
>  
> sysfs_notify(&asus->platform_device->dev.kobj, NULL,
> diff --git a/include/linux/platform_data/x86/asus-wmi.h b/include/linux/platform_data/x86/asus-wmi.h
> index b3c35e33f1e7..62982f67d632 100644
> --- a/include/linux/platform_data/x86/asus-wmi.h
> +++ b/include/linux/platform_data/x86/asus-wmi.h
> @@ -65,6 +65,7 @@
> /* Writing a brightness re-enables the screen if disabled */
> #define ASUS_WMI_DEVID_SCREENPAD_LIGHT 0x00050032
> #define ASUS_WMI_DEVID_FAN_BOOST_MODE 0x00110018
> +#define ASUS_WMI_DEVID_FAN_BOOST_MODE2 0x00110019
> #define ASUS_WMI_DEVID_THROTTLE_THERMAL_POLICY 0x00120075
>  
> /* Misc */
> -- 
> 2.45.2
> 
> 


Thank you for the work on this. But I must point out that the same 0x00110019 method has already been submitted as a patch to work with the existing "throttle_thermal" functionality, which itself is also tied to platoform_profile class support.

See https://lore.kernel.org/platform-driver-x86/20240609144849.2532-1-mohamed.ghanmi@supcom.tn/T/#mcd18e74676084e21d5c15af84bc08d8c6b375fb9

If you could submit only the first patch instead please?

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ