| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <000000000000098a89061b4c61a9@google.com>
Date: Wed, 19 Jun 2024 23:25:19 -0700
From: syzbot <syzbot+70d7737fe34ba0f39ccd@...kaller.appspotmail.com>
To: jfs-discussion@...ts.sourceforge.net, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
shaggy@...nel.org, syzkaller-bugs@...glegroups.com
Subject: [syzbot] [jfs?] possible deadlock in diAllocAG
Hello,
syzbot found the following issue on:
HEAD commit: 2ccbdf43d5e7 Merge tag 'for-linus' of git://git.kernel.org..
git tree: upstream
console output: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/x/log.txt?x=15d7c1de980000
kernel config: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/x/.config?x=81c0d76ceef02b39
dashboard link: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/bug?extid=70d7737fe34ba0f39ccd
compiler: gcc (Debian 12.2.0-14) 12.2.0, GNU ld (GNU Binutils for Debian) 2.40
userspace arch: i386
Unfortunately, I don't have any reproducer for this issue yet.
Downloadable assets:
disk image (non-bootable): https://storage.googleapis.com/syzbot-assets/7bc7510fe41f/non_bootable_disk-2ccbdf43.raw.xz
vmlinux: https://storage.googleapis.com/syzbot-assets/13cdb5bfbafa/vmlinux-2ccbdf43.xz
kernel image: https://storage.googleapis.com/syzbot-assets/7a14f5d07f81/bzImage-2ccbdf43.xz
IMPORTANT: if you fix the issue, please add the following tag to the commit:
Reported-by: syzbot+70d7737fe34ba0f39ccd@...kaller.appspotmail.com
======================================================
WARNING: possible circular locking dependency detected
6.10.0-rc3-syzkaller-00044-g2ccbdf43d5e7 #0 Not tainted
------------------------------------------------------
syz-executor.0/7415 is trying to acquire lock:
ffff88806b966788 (&jfs_ip->commit_mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: diNewIAG fs/jfs/jfs_imap.c:2519 [inline]
ffff88806b966788 (&jfs_ip->commit_mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: diAllocExt fs/jfs/jfs_imap.c:1902 [inline]
ffff88806b966788 (&jfs_ip->commit_mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: diAllocAG+0xc59/0x2300 fs/jfs/jfs_imap.c:1666
but task is already holding lock:
ffff88806b9666f8 (&jfs_ip->rdwrlock/1){++++}-{3:3}, at: diNewIAG fs/jfs/jfs_imap.c:2474 [inline]
ffff88806b9666f8 (&jfs_ip->rdwrlock/1){++++}-{3:3}, at: diAllocExt fs/jfs/jfs_imap.c:1902 [inline]
ffff88806b9666f8 (&jfs_ip->rdwrlock/1){++++}-{3:3}, at: diAllocAG+0xa99/0x2300 fs/jfs/jfs_imap.c:1666
which lock already depends on the new lock.
the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is:
-> #3 (&jfs_ip->rdwrlock/1){++++}-{3:3}:
down_read_nested+0x9e/0x330 kernel/locking/rwsem.c:1651
diAllocExt fs/jfs/jfs_imap.c:1914 [inline]
diAllocAG+0x235/0x2300 fs/jfs/jfs_imap.c:1666
diAlloc+0x8f7/0x1a70 fs/jfs/jfs_imap.c:1587
ialloc+0x84/0x9e0 fs/jfs/jfs_inode.c:56
jfs_mkdir+0x244/0xb30 fs/jfs/namei.c:225
vfs_mkdir+0x57d/0x860 fs/namei.c:4131
do_mkdirat+0x301/0x3a0 fs/namei.c:4154
__do_sys_mkdirat fs/namei.c:4169 [inline]
__se_sys_mkdirat fs/namei.c:4167 [inline]
__ia32_sys_mkdirat+0x84/0xb0 fs/namei.c:4167
do_syscall_32_irqs_on arch/x86/entry/common.c:165 [inline]
__do_fast_syscall_32+0x73/0x120 arch/x86/entry/common.c:386
do_fast_syscall_32+0x32/0x80 arch/x86/entry/common.c:411
entry_SYSENTER_compat_after_hwframe+0x84/0x8e
-> #2 (&(imap->im_aglock[index])){+.+.}-{3:3}:
__mutex_lock_common kernel/locking/mutex.c:608 [inline]
__mutex_lock+0x175/0x9c0 kernel/locking/mutex.c:752
diFree+0x2ff/0x2770 fs/jfs/jfs_imap.c:886
jfs_evict_inode+0x3d4/0x4b0 fs/jfs/inode.c:156
evict+0x2ed/0x6c0 fs/inode.c:667
iput_final fs/inode.c:1741 [inline]
iput.part.0+0x5a8/0x7f0 fs/inode.c:1767
iput+0x5c/0x80 fs/inode.c:1757
dentry_unlink_inode+0x295/0x480 fs/dcache.c:400
__dentry_kill+0x1d0/0x600 fs/dcache.c:603
shrink_kill fs/dcache.c:1048 [inline]
shrink_dentry_list+0x140/0x5d0 fs/dcache.c:1075
prune_dcache_sb+0xeb/0x150 fs/dcache.c:1156
super_cache_scan+0x32a/0x550 fs/super.c:221
do_shrink_slab+0x44f/0x11c0 mm/shrinker.c:435
shrink_slab_memcg mm/shrinker.c:548 [inline]
shrink_slab+0xa87/0x1310 mm/shrinker.c:626
shrink_one+0x493/0x7c0 mm/vmscan.c:4790
shrink_many mm/vmscan.c:4851 [inline]
lru_gen_shrink_node+0x89f/0x1750 mm/vmscan.c:4951
shrink_node mm/vmscan.c:5910 [inline]
kswapd_shrink_node mm/vmscan.c:6720 [inline]
balance_pgdat+0x1105/0x1970 mm/vmscan.c:6911
kswapd+0x5ea/0xbf0 mm/vmscan.c:7180
kthread+0x2c1/0x3a0 kernel/kthread.c:389
ret_from_fork+0x45/0x80 arch/x86/kernel/process.c:147
ret_from_fork_asm+0x1a/0x30 arch/x86/entry/entry_64.S:244
-> #1 (fs_reclaim){+.+.}-{0:0}:
__fs_reclaim_acquire mm/page_alloc.c:3801 [inline]
fs_reclaim_acquire+0x102/0x160 mm/page_alloc.c:3815
might_alloc include/linux/sched/mm.h:334 [inline]
slab_pre_alloc_hook mm/slub.c:3891 [inline]
slab_alloc_node mm/slub.c:3981 [inline]
__do_kmalloc_node mm/slub.c:4121 [inline]
__kmalloc_noprof+0xb5/0x420 mm/slub.c:4135
kmalloc_noprof include/linux/slab.h:664 [inline]
__jfs_set_acl+0xaa/0x1a0 fs/jfs/acl.c:80
jfs_set_acl+0x256/0x330 fs/jfs/acl.c:115
set_posix_acl+0x25c/0x320 fs/posix_acl.c:955
vfs_set_acl+0x53d/0x940 fs/posix_acl.c:1134
do_set_acl+0xd9/0x1b0 fs/posix_acl.c:1279
do_setxattr+0xeb/0x170 fs/xattr.c:626
setxattr+0x15d/0x180 fs/xattr.c:652
path_setxattr+0x179/0x1e0 fs/xattr.c:671
__do_sys_setxattr fs/xattr.c:687 [inline]
__se_sys_setxattr fs/xattr.c:683 [inline]
__ia32_sys_setxattr+0xc0/0x160 fs/xattr.c:683
do_syscall_32_irqs_on arch/x86/entry/common.c:165 [inline]
__do_fast_syscall_32+0x73/0x120 arch/x86/entry/common.c:386
do_fast_syscall_32+0x32/0x80 arch/x86/entry/common.c:411
entry_SYSENTER_compat_after_hwframe+0x84/0x8e
-> #0 (&jfs_ip->commit_mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}:
check_prev_add kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3134 [inline]
check_prevs_add kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3253 [inline]
validate_chain kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3869 [inline]
__lock_acquire+0x2478/0x3b30 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5137
lock_acquire kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5754 [inline]
lock_acquire+0x1b1/0x560 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5719
__mutex_lock_common kernel/locking/mutex.c:608 [inline]
__mutex_lock+0x175/0x9c0 kernel/locking/mutex.c:752
diNewIAG fs/jfs/jfs_imap.c:2519 [inline]
diAllocExt fs/jfs/jfs_imap.c:1902 [inline]
diAllocAG+0xc59/0x2300 fs/jfs/jfs_imap.c:1666
diAlloc+0x8f7/0x1a70 fs/jfs/jfs_imap.c:1587
ialloc+0x84/0x9e0 fs/jfs/jfs_inode.c:56
jfs_mkdir+0x244/0xb30 fs/jfs/namei.c:225
vfs_mkdir+0x57d/0x860 fs/namei.c:4131
do_mkdirat+0x301/0x3a0 fs/namei.c:4154
__do_sys_mkdirat fs/namei.c:4169 [inline]
__se_sys_mkdirat fs/namei.c:4167 [inline]
__ia32_sys_mkdirat+0x84/0xb0 fs/namei.c:4167
do_syscall_32_irqs_on arch/x86/entry/common.c:165 [inline]
__do_fast_syscall_32+0x73/0x120 arch/x86/entry/common.c:386
do_fast_syscall_32+0x32/0x80 arch/x86/entry/common.c:411
entry_SYSENTER_compat_after_hwframe+0x84/0x8e
other info that might help us debug this:
Chain exists of:
&jfs_ip->commit_mutex --> &(imap->im_aglock[index]) --> &jfs_ip->rdwrlock/1
Possible unsafe locking scenario:
CPU0 CPU1
---- ----
lock(&jfs_ip->rdwrlock/1);
lock(&(imap->im_aglock[index]));
lock(&jfs_ip->rdwrlock/1);
lock(&jfs_ip->commit_mutex);
*** DEADLOCK ***
5 locks held by syz-executor.0/7415:
#0: ffff888059e4c420 (sb_writers#14){.+.+}-{0:0}, at: filename_create+0x10d/0x530 fs/namei.c:3893
#1: ffff88806b967480 (&type->i_mutex_dir_key#10/1){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: inode_lock_nested include/linux/fs.h:826 [inline]
#1: ffff88806b967480 (&type->i_mutex_dir_key#10/1){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: filename_create+0x1c2/0x530 fs/namei.c:3900
#2: ffff888066090920 (&(imap->im_aglock[index])){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: diAlloc+0xb9c/0x1a70 fs/jfs/jfs_imap.c:1370
#3: ffff888066090890 (&imap->im_freelock){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: diNewIAG fs/jfs/jfs_imap.c:2457 [inline]
#3: ffff888066090890 (&imap->im_freelock){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: diAllocExt fs/jfs/jfs_imap.c:1902 [inline]
#3: ffff888066090890 (&imap->im_freelock){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: diAllocAG+0x782/0x2300 fs/jfs/jfs_imap.c:1666
#4: ffff88806b9666f8 (&jfs_ip->rdwrlock/1){++++}-{3:3}, at: diNewIAG fs/jfs/jfs_imap.c:2474 [inline]
#4: ffff88806b9666f8 (&jfs_ip->rdwrlock/1){++++}-{3:3}, at: diAllocExt fs/jfs/jfs_imap.c:1902 [inline]
#4: ffff88806b9666f8 (&jfs_ip->rdwrlock/1){++++}-{3:3}, at: diAllocAG+0xa99/0x2300 fs/jfs/jfs_imap.c:1666
stack backtrace:
CPU: 0 PID: 7415 Comm: syz-executor.0 Not tainted 6.10.0-rc3-syzkaller-00044-g2ccbdf43d5e7 #0
Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009), BIOS 1.16.2-debian-1.16.2-1 04/01/2014
Call Trace:
<TASK>
__dump_stack lib/dump_stack.c:88 [inline]
dump_stack_lvl+0x116/0x1f0 lib/dump_stack.c:114
check_noncircular+0x31a/0x400 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:2187
check_prev_add kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3134 [inline]
check_prevs_add kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3253 [inline]
validate_chain kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3869 [inline]
__lock_acquire+0x2478/0x3b30 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5137
lock_acquire kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5754 [inline]
lock_acquire+0x1b1/0x560 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5719
__mutex_lock_common kernel/locking/mutex.c:608 [inline]
__mutex_lock+0x175/0x9c0 kernel/locking/mutex.c:752
diNewIAG fs/jfs/jfs_imap.c:2519 [inline]
diAllocExt fs/jfs/jfs_imap.c:1902 [inline]
diAllocAG+0xc59/0x2300 fs/jfs/jfs_imap.c:1666
diAlloc+0x8f7/0x1a70 fs/jfs/jfs_imap.c:1587
ialloc+0x84/0x9e0 fs/jfs/jfs_inode.c:56
jfs_mkdir+0x244/0xb30 fs/jfs/namei.c:225
vfs_mkdir+0x57d/0x860 fs/namei.c:4131
do_mkdirat+0x301/0x3a0 fs/namei.c:4154
__do_sys_mkdirat fs/namei.c:4169 [inline]
__se_sys_mkdirat fs/namei.c:4167 [inline]
__ia32_sys_mkdirat+0x84/0xb0 fs/namei.c:4167
do_syscall_32_irqs_on arch/x86/entry/common.c:165 [inline]
__do_fast_syscall_32+0x73/0x120 arch/x86/entry/common.c:386
do_fast_syscall_32+0x32/0x80 arch/x86/entry/common.c:411
entry_SYSENTER_compat_after_hwframe+0x84/0x8e
RIP: 0023:0xf7312579
Code: b8 01 10 06 03 74 b4 01 10 07 03 74 b0 01 10 08 03 74 d8 01 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 51 52 55 89 e5 0f 34 cd 80 <5d> 5a 59 c3 90 90 90 90 8d b4 26 00 00 00 00 8d b4 26 00 00 00 00
RSP: 002b:00000000f5f04418 EFLAGS: 00000296 ORIG_RAX: 0000000000000128
RAX: ffffffffffffffda RBX: 00000000ffffff9c RCX: 0000000020000040
RDX: 00000000000001ff RSI: 0000000000000000 RDI: 00000000000000fc
RBP: 0000000000000000 R08: 0000000000000000 R09: 0000000000000000
R10: 0000000000000000 R11: 0000000000000292 R12: 0000000000000000
R13: 0000000000000000 R14: 0000000000000000 R15: 0000000000000000
</TASK>
----------------
Code disassembly (best guess), 2 bytes skipped:
0: 10 06 adc %al,(%rsi)
2: 03 74 b4 01 add 0x1(%rsp,%rsi,4),%esi
6: 10 07 adc %al,(%rdi)
8: 03 74 b0 01 add 0x1(%rax,%rsi,4),%esi
c: 10 08 adc %cl,(%rax)
e: 03 74 d8 01 add 0x1(%rax,%rbx,8),%esi
1e: 00 51 52 add %dl,0x52(%rcx)
21: 55 push %rbp
22: 89 e5 mov %esp,%ebp
24: 0f 34 sysenter
26: cd 80 int $0x80
* 28: 5d pop %rbp <-- trapping instruction
29: 5a pop %rdx
2a: 59 pop %rcx
2b: c3 ret
2c: 90 nop
2d: 90 nop
2e: 90 nop
2f: 90 nop
30: 8d b4 26 00 00 00 00 lea 0x0(%rsi,%riz,1),%esi
37: 8d b4 26 00 00 00 00 lea 0x0(%rsi,%riz,1),%esi
---
This report is generated by a bot. It may contain errors.
See https://goo.gl/tpsmEJ for more information about syzbot.
syzbot engineers can be reached at syzkaller@...glegroups.com.
syzbot will keep track of this issue. See:
https://goo.gl/tpsmEJ#status for how to communicate with syzbot.
If the report is already addressed, let syzbot know by replying with:
#syz fix: exact-commit-title
If you want to overwrite report's subsystems, reply with:
#syz set subsystems: new-subsystem
(See the list of subsystem names on the web dashboard)
If the report is a duplicate of another one, reply with:
#syz dup: exact-subject-of-another-report
If you want to undo deduplication, reply with:
#syz undup
Powered by blists - more mailing lists