lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <04517096-38a0-465f-86f7-7e8c7de702a2@quicinc.com>
Date: Thu, 20 Jun 2024 08:46:08 +0800
From: Tengfei Fan <quic_tengfan@...cinc.com>
To: Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@...aro.org>, <andersson@...nel.org>,
        <robh@...nel.org>, <krzk+dt@...nel.org>, <conor+dt@...nel.org>,
        <dmitry.baryshkov@...aro.org>
CC: <linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org>, <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
        <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <kernel@...cinc.com>,
        Fenglin Wu
	<quic_fenglinw@...cinc.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v10 3/4] arm64: dts: qcom: add base AIM300 dtsi



On 6/19/2024 3:06 AM, Konrad Dybcio wrote:
> 
> 
> On 6/18/24 09:22, Tengfei Fan wrote:
>> AIM300 Series is a highly optimized family of modules designed to
>> support AIoT applications. It integrates QCS8550 SoC, UFS and PMIC
>> chip etc.
>> Here is a diagram of AIM300 SoM:
>>            +----------------------------------------+
>>            |AIM300 SoM                              |
>>            |                                        |
>>            |                           +-----+      |
>>            |                      |--->| UFS |      |
>>            |                      |    +-----+      |
>>            |                      |                 |
>>            |                      |                 |
>>       3.7v |  +-----------------+ |    +---------+  |
>>    ---------->|       PMIC      |----->| QCS8550 |  |
>>            |  +-----------------+      +---------+  |
>>            |                      |                 |
>>            |                      |                 |
>>            |                      |    +-----+      |
>>            |                      |--->| ... |      |
>>            |                           +-----+      |
>>            |                                        |
>>            +----------------------------------------+
>>
>> Co-developed-by: Fenglin Wu <quic_fenglinw@...cinc.com>
>> Signed-off-by: Fenglin Wu <quic_fenglinw@...cinc.com>
>> Reviewed-by: Dmitry Baryshkov <dmitry.baryshkov@...aro.org>
>> Signed-off-by: Tengfei Fan <quic_tengfan@...cinc.com>
>> ---
> 
> [...]
> 
>> +&ufs_mem_hc {
>> +    reset-gpios = <&tlmm 210 GPIO_ACTIVE_LOW>;
>> +    vcc-supply = <&vreg_l17b_2p5>;
>> +    vcc-max-microamp = <1300000>;
>> +    vccq-supply = <&vreg_l1g_1p2>;
>> +    vccq-max-microamp = <1200000>;
>> +    vdd-hba-supply = <&vreg_l3g_1p2>;
> 
> These regulators should generally have:
> 
> regulator-allow-set-load;
> regulator-allowed-modes = <RPMH_REGULATOR_MODE_LPM
>                             RPMH_REGULATOR_MODE_HPM>;
> 
> although the current setup you have never lets them exit HPM
> 
> Konrad

I understand your point is that these settings need to be added to 
allthe child regulator nodes of regulators-0, regulators-1, 
regulators-2, regulators-3, regulators-4 and regulators-5. Is that correct?



-- 
Thx and BRs,
Tengfei Fan

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ