[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <171888201712.41294.3998570181399309379.b4-ty@kernel.org>
Date: Thu, 20 Jun 2024 12:13:37 +0100
From: Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
To: Shawn Guo <shawnguo@...nel.org>, Sascha Hauer <s.hauer@...gutronix.de>,
Pengutronix Kernel Team <kernel@...gutronix.de>,
Fabio Estevam <festevam@...il.com>,
Stefan Moring <stefan.moring@...hnolution.nl>,
Benjamin Bigler <benjamin@...ler.one>, Carlos Song <carlos.song@....com>,
Clark Wang <xiaoning.wang@....com>, Adam Butcher <adam@...samine.co.uk>,
Marc Kleine-Budde <mkl@...gutronix.de>
Cc: linux-spi@...r.kernel.org, imx@...ts.linux.dev,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Stefan Bigler <linux@...ler.io>, Sebastian Reichel <sre@...nel.org>,
Thorsten Scherer <T.Scherer@...elmann.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] spi: spi-imx: imx51: revert burst length calculation
back to bits_per_word
On Tue, 18 Jun 2024 19:34:18 +0200, Marc Kleine-Budde wrote:
> The patch 15a6af94a277 ("spi: Increase imx51 ecspi burst length based
> on transfer length") increased the burst length calculation in
> mx51_ecspi_prepare_transfer() to be based on the transfer length.
>
> This breaks HW CS + SPI_CS_WORD support which was added in
> 6e95b23a5b2d ("spi: imx: Implement support for CS_WORD") and transfers
> with bits-per-word != 8, 16, 32.
>
> [...]
Applied to
https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/broonie/spi.git for-next
Thanks!
[1/1] spi: spi-imx: imx51: revert burst length calculation back to bits_per_word
commit: df75470b317b46affbe1f5f8f006b34175be9789
All being well this means that it will be integrated into the linux-next
tree (usually sometime in the next 24 hours) and sent to Linus during
the next merge window (or sooner if it is a bug fix), however if
problems are discovered then the patch may be dropped or reverted.
You may get further e-mails resulting from automated or manual testing
and review of the tree, please engage with people reporting problems and
send followup patches addressing any issues that are reported if needed.
If any updates are required or you are submitting further changes they
should be sent as incremental updates against current git, existing
patches will not be replaced.
Please add any relevant lists and maintainers to the CCs when replying
to this mail.
Thanks,
Mark
Powered by blists - more mailing lists