[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20240620120641.jr2m4zpnzzjqeycq@skbuf>
Date: Thu, 20 Jun 2024 15:06:41 +0300
From: Vladimir Oltean <olteanv@...il.com>
To: Lukasz Majewski <lukma@...x.de>
Cc: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>, Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Oleksij Rempel <o.rempel@...gutronix.de>, Tristram.Ha@...rochip.com,
Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@...utronix.de>,
Simon Horman <horms@...nel.org>,
Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@...aro.org>,
"Ricardo B. Marliere" <ricardo@...liere.net>,
Casper Andersson <casper.casan@...il.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Woojung Huh <woojung.huh@...rochip.com>,
UNGLinuxDriver@...rochip.com, Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 net-next] net: dsa: Allow only up to two HSR HW
offloaded ports for KSZ9477
On Thu, Jun 20, 2024 at 02:00:44PM +0200, Lukasz Majewski wrote:
> In general I do understand your concerns - however, as I've stated this
> patch fixes oddity of the KSZ9477. I can test it with it.
> To keep it short: I do see your point, but I believe that it is out of
> the scope for this particular patch.
So that's it? Can't test with anything other than KSZ9477 => don't care
about anything else, and will ignore review feedback, even if the static
analysis of the code plausibly points to a more widespread issue?
As the author of commit 5055cccfc2d1 ("net: hsr: Provide RedBox support
(HSR-SAN)"), who do you think should be responsible of taking care that
it plays well with existing offloading drivers?
Powered by blists - more mailing lists