linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2 3/3] mctp pcc: Implement MCTP over PCC Transport

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date: Thu, 20 Jun 2024 06:26:47 -0700
From: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
To: Adam Young <admiyo@...eremail.onmicrosoft.com>
Cc: admiyo@...amperecomputing.com, Jeremy Kerr <jk@...econstruct.com.au>,
 Matt Johnston <matt@...econstruct.com.au>, "David S. Miller"
 <davem@...emloft.net>, Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>, Paolo Abeni
 <pabeni@...hat.com>, netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 3/3] mctp pcc: Implement MCTP over PCC Transport

On Wed, 19 Jun 2024 23:24:41 -0400 Adam Young wrote:
> > drivers/net/mctp/mctp-pcc.c:344:3: error: field designator 'owner' does not refer to any field in type 'struct acpi_driver'
> >    344 |         .owner = THIS_MODULE,
> >        |         ~^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~  
> 
> Not sure how you are getting that last error.  I do not, and the v6.9.3 
> code base has this in include/acpi/acpi_bus.h at line 166

v6.9.3 is not a development kernel. Your patches will be merged to net-next.
Read more of the process doc I linked in the previous message.

> That runs clean.

It doesn't on patches 1 and 2, but you're right, I think it's
intentional / because of the "historical" ACPI coding style :(