[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <d72dd190-39d1-49ca-aeb2-9c0bc1357b68@lunn.ch>
Date: Thu, 20 Jun 2024 15:49:42 +0200
From: Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>
To: Rengarajan.S@...rochip.com
Cc: linux-usb@...r.kernel.org, davem@...emloft.net,
Woojung.Huh@...rochip.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
pabeni@...hat.com, netdev@...r.kernel.org, edumazet@...gle.com,
UNGLinuxDriver@...rochip.com, kuba@...nel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v1] lan78xx: lan7801 MAC support with lan8841
On Thu, Jun 20, 2024 at 05:48:31AM +0000, Rengarajan.S@...rochip.com wrote:
> Hi Andrew,
>
> Apologies for the delay in reply. Thanks for reviewing the patch.
> Please find my comments inline.
>
> On Thu, 2024-06-13 at 22:46 +0200, Andrew Lunn wrote:
> > EXTERNAL EMAIL: Do not click links or open attachments unless you
> > know the content is safe
> >
> > On Tue, Jun 11, 2024 at 03:12:33PM +0530, Rengarajan S wrote:
> > > Add lan7801 MAC only support with lan8841. The PHY fixup is
> > > registered
> > > for lan8841 and the initializations are done using lan8835_fixup
> > > since
> > > the register configs are similar for both lann8841 and lan8835.
> >
> > What exactly does this fixup do?
>
> Fixup related to the phy handle and manage the configuration and status
> registers of a particular phy. In this patch it is used to handle the
> configuration registers of LAN8841 which are similar to registers in
> LAN8835.
Details please, not hand waving. What does the errata say? Why is this
specific to your USB dongle, and not all cases where this PHY is used?
> > Looking at it, what protects it from being used on some other device
> > which also happens to use the same PHY? Is there something to
> > guarantee:
> >
> > struct lan78xx_net *dev = netdev_priv(phydev->attached_dev);
> >
> > really is a lan78xx_net * ?
>
> In this case fixup is called through lan78xx only when interfacing the
> phy with lan78xx MAC. Since this will not be called on interfacing with
> other devices, it prevents them from accessing the registers.
Please give me a details explanation why this fixup will not be
applied to other instances of this PHY in the system.
Andrew
Powered by blists - more mailing lists