| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Thu, 20 Jun 2024 10:05:18 -0400 From: Nicolas Dufresne <nicolas.dufresne@...labora.com> To: Devarsh Thakkar <devarsht@...com>, "jackson.lee" <jackson.lee@...psnmedia.com>, "mchehab@...nel.org" <mchehab@...nel.org>, "sebastian.fricke@...labora.com" <sebastian.fricke@...labora.com> Cc: "linux-media@...r.kernel.org" <linux-media@...r.kernel.org>, "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, "hverkuil@...all.nl" <hverkuil@...all.nl>, Nas Chung <nas.chung@...psnmedia.com>, "lafley.kim" <lafley.kim@...psnmedia.com>, "b-brnich@...com" <b-brnich@...com>, "Luthra, Jai" <j-luthra@...com>, Vibhore <vibhore@...com>, Dhruva Gole <d-gole@...com>, Aradhya <a-bhatia1@...com>, "Raghavendra, Vignesh" <vigneshr@...com> Subject: Re: [RESEND PATCH v6 2/4] media: chips-media: wave5: Support runtime suspend/resume Hi Devarsh, Le jeudi 20 juin 2024 à 15:05 +0530, Devarsh Thakkar a écrit : > In my view the delayed suspend functionality is generally helpful for devices > where resume latencies are higher for e.g. this light sensor driver [2] uses > it because it takes 250ms to stabilize after resumption and I don't see this > being used in codec drivers generally since there is no such large resume > latency. Please let me know if I am missing something or there is a strong > reason to have delayed suspend for wave5. It sounds like you did proper scientific testing of the suspend results calls, mind sharing the actual data ? Nicolas
Powered by blists - more mailing lists