linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v1 2/3] net: ethernet: arc: remove emac

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <4777231.1oUyQt6lIG@diego>
Date: Thu, 20 Jun 2024 16:26:03 +0200
From: Heiko Stübner <heiko@...ech.de>
To: Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>, Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
Cc: Johan Jonker <jbx6244@...il.com>, davem@...emloft.net,
 edumazet@...gle.com, robh@...nel.org, krzk+dt@...nel.org,
 conor+dt@...nel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
 linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-rockchip@...ts.infradead.org,
 linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 2/3] net: ethernet: arc: remove emac_arc driver

Am Donnerstag, 20. Juni 2024, 15:37:29 CEST schrieb Jakub Kicinski:
> On Thu, 20 Jun 2024 15:19:24 +0200 Paolo Abeni wrote:
> > AFAICS this depends on the previous DT patch, which in turn should go
> > via the arm tree.
> > 
> > Perhaps the whole series should go via the arm tree?
> 
> FWIW Heiko said on patch 1 that the whole thing should go via netdev...

yep.

Reasoning is that the rk3066 is mostly inactive, so taking that dt-patch
through the net-tree won't create conflicts with other dt-changes here.

And of course both binding and driver changes are the bigger parts
of this series.