linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2] drm/panel: raydium-rm692e5: transition to mipi

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAD=FV=WtL-Dq1gfdhmmHVJhWijE8pusKzf-x5TRe9a2KkXCcwg@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 20 Jun 2024 07:48:20 -0700
From: Doug Anderson <dianders@...omium.org>
To: Tejas Vipin <tejasvipin76@...il.com>
Cc: neil.armstrong@...aro.org, quic_jesszhan@...cinc.com, 
	maarten.lankhorst@...ux.intel.com, mripard@...nel.org, tzimmermann@...e.de, 
	airlied@...il.com, daniel@...ll.ch, dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org, 
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] drm/panel: raydium-rm692e5: transition to mipi_dsi
 wrapped functions

Hi,

On Tue, Jun 18, 2024 at 8:34 PM Tejas Vipin <tejasvipin76@...il.com> wrote:
>
> Use functions introduced in commit 966e397e4f60 ("drm/mipi-dsi: Introduce
> mipi_dsi_*_write_seq_multi()") and commit f79d6d28d8fe
> ("drm/mipi-dsi: wrap more functions for streamline handling") for the
> raydium rm692e5 panel.

It should be noted in the patch notes that as part of this patch there
is a small functionality change which is arguably a bugfix.
Specifically if some of the initialization commands in
rm692e5_prepare() fail we'll now properly power the panel back off.

IMO it's not a big enough deal to add a "Fixes" line since it's
unlikely anyone is actually hitting this. If you want to add a Fixes
tag (or someone else feels strongly that there should be one), the
right way would probably to make this a 2-patch series and have _just_
the bugfix first and then have the conversion be a no-op.


> Signed-off-by: Tejas Vipin <tejasvipin76@...il.com>
> ---
> Changes in v2:
>     - Change rm692e5_on to return void and take mipi_dsi_multi_context
>       as an argument.
>     - Remove unnecessary warnings.
>     - More efficient error handling in rm692e5_prepare
>
> v1: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20240615093758.65431-1-tejasvipin76@gmail.com/
> ---
>  drivers/gpu/drm/panel/panel-raydium-rm692e5.c | 237 ++++++++----------
>  1 file changed, 99 insertions(+), 138 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/panel/panel-raydium-rm692e5.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/panel/panel-raydium-rm692e5.c
> index 21d97f6b8a2f..9936bda61af2 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/panel/panel-raydium-rm692e5.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/panel/panel-raydium-rm692e5.c
> @@ -40,176 +40,137 @@ static void rm692e5_reset(struct rm692e5_panel *ctx)
>         usleep_range(10000, 11000);
>  }
>
> -static int rm692e5_on(struct rm692e5_panel *ctx)
> +static void rm692e5_on(struct mipi_dsi_multi_context *dsi_ctx)
>  {
> -       struct mipi_dsi_device *dsi = ctx->dsi;
> -       struct device *dev = &dsi->dev;
> -       int ret;
> +       dsi_ctx->dsi->mode_flags |= MIPI_DSI_MODE_LPM;
> +
> +       mipi_dsi_generic_write_seq_multi(dsi_ctx, 0xfe, 0x41);
> +       mipi_dsi_generic_write_seq_multi(dsi_ctx, 0xd6, 0x00);
> +       mipi_dsi_generic_write_seq_multi(dsi_ctx, 0xfe, 0x16);
> +       mipi_dsi_generic_write_seq_multi(dsi_ctx, 0x8a, 0x87);
> +       mipi_dsi_generic_write_seq_multi(dsi_ctx, 0xfe, 0x71);
> +       mipi_dsi_generic_write_seq_multi(dsi_ctx, 0x82, 0x01);
> +       mipi_dsi_generic_write_seq_multi(dsi_ctx, 0xc6, 0x00);
> +       mipi_dsi_generic_write_seq_multi(dsi_ctx, 0xc7, 0x2c);
> +       mipi_dsi_generic_write_seq_multi(dsi_ctx, 0xc8, 0x64);
> +       mipi_dsi_generic_write_seq_multi(dsi_ctx, 0xc9, 0x3c);
> +       mipi_dsi_generic_write_seq_multi(dsi_ctx, 0xca, 0x80);
> +       mipi_dsi_generic_write_seq_multi(dsi_ctx, 0xcb, 0x02);
> +       mipi_dsi_generic_write_seq_multi(dsi_ctx, 0xcc, 0x02);
> +       mipi_dsi_generic_write_seq_multi(dsi_ctx, 0xfe, 0x38);
> +       mipi_dsi_generic_write_seq_multi(dsi_ctx, 0x18, 0x13);
> +       mipi_dsi_generic_write_seq_multi(dsi_ctx, 0xfe, 0xf4);
> +       mipi_dsi_generic_write_seq_multi(dsi_ctx, 0x00, 0xff);
> +       mipi_dsi_generic_write_seq_multi(dsi_ctx, 0x01, 0xff);
> +       mipi_dsi_generic_write_seq_multi(dsi_ctx, 0x02, 0xcf);
> +       mipi_dsi_generic_write_seq_multi(dsi_ctx, 0x03, 0xbc);
> +       mipi_dsi_generic_write_seq_multi(dsi_ctx, 0x04, 0xb9);
> +       mipi_dsi_generic_write_seq_multi(dsi_ctx, 0x05, 0x99);
> +       mipi_dsi_generic_write_seq_multi(dsi_ctx, 0x06, 0x02);
> +       mipi_dsi_generic_write_seq_multi(dsi_ctx, 0x07, 0x0a);
> +       mipi_dsi_generic_write_seq_multi(dsi_ctx, 0x08, 0xe0);
> +       mipi_dsi_generic_write_seq_multi(dsi_ctx, 0x09, 0x4c);
> +       mipi_dsi_generic_write_seq_multi(dsi_ctx, 0x0a, 0xeb);
> +       mipi_dsi_generic_write_seq_multi(dsi_ctx, 0x0b, 0xe8);
> +       mipi_dsi_generic_write_seq_multi(dsi_ctx, 0x0c, 0x32);
> +       mipi_dsi_generic_write_seq_multi(dsi_ctx, 0x0d, 0x07);
> +       mipi_dsi_generic_write_seq_multi(dsi_ctx, 0xfe, 0xf4);
> +       mipi_dsi_generic_write_seq_multi(dsi_ctx, 0x0d, 0xc0);
> +       mipi_dsi_generic_write_seq_multi(dsi_ctx, 0x0e, 0xff);
> +       mipi_dsi_generic_write_seq_multi(dsi_ctx, 0x0f, 0xff);
> +       mipi_dsi_generic_write_seq_multi(dsi_ctx, 0x10, 0x33);
> +       mipi_dsi_generic_write_seq_multi(dsi_ctx, 0x11, 0x6f);
> +       mipi_dsi_generic_write_seq_multi(dsi_ctx, 0x12, 0x6e);
> +       mipi_dsi_generic_write_seq_multi(dsi_ctx, 0x13, 0xa6);
> +       mipi_dsi_generic_write_seq_multi(dsi_ctx, 0x14, 0x80);
> +       mipi_dsi_generic_write_seq_multi(dsi_ctx, 0x15, 0x02);
> +       mipi_dsi_generic_write_seq_multi(dsi_ctx, 0x16, 0x38);
> +       mipi_dsi_generic_write_seq_multi(dsi_ctx, 0x17, 0xd3);
> +       mipi_dsi_generic_write_seq_multi(dsi_ctx, 0x18, 0x3a);
> +       mipi_dsi_generic_write_seq_multi(dsi_ctx, 0x19, 0xba);
> +       mipi_dsi_generic_write_seq_multi(dsi_ctx, 0x1a, 0xcc);
> +       mipi_dsi_generic_write_seq_multi(dsi_ctx, 0x1b, 0x01);
> +
> +       mipi_dsi_dcs_nop_multi(dsi_ctx);
> +
> +       mipi_dsi_msleep(dsi_ctx, 32);
> +
> +       mipi_dsi_generic_write_seq_multi(dsi_ctx, 0xfe, 0x38);
> +       mipi_dsi_generic_write_seq_multi(dsi_ctx, 0x18, 0x13);
> +       mipi_dsi_generic_write_seq_multi(dsi_ctx, 0xfe, 0xd1);
> +       mipi_dsi_generic_write_seq_multi(dsi_ctx, 0xd3, 0x00);
> +       mipi_dsi_generic_write_seq_multi(dsi_ctx, 0xd0, 0x00);
> +       mipi_dsi_generic_write_seq_multi(dsi_ctx, 0xd2, 0x00);
> +       mipi_dsi_generic_write_seq_multi(dsi_ctx, 0xd4, 0x00);
> +       mipi_dsi_generic_write_seq_multi(dsi_ctx, 0xb4, 0x01);
> +       mipi_dsi_generic_write_seq_multi(dsi_ctx, 0xfe, 0xf9);
> +       mipi_dsi_generic_write_seq_multi(dsi_ctx, 0x00, 0xaf);
> +       mipi_dsi_generic_write_seq_multi(dsi_ctx, 0x1d, 0x37);
> +       mipi_dsi_generic_write_seq_multi(dsi_ctx, 0x44, 0x0a, 0x7b);
> +       mipi_dsi_generic_write_seq_multi(dsi_ctx, 0xfe, 0x00);
> +       mipi_dsi_generic_write_seq_multi(dsi_ctx, 0xfa, 0x01);
> +       mipi_dsi_generic_write_seq_multi(dsi_ctx, 0xc2, 0x08);
> +       mipi_dsi_generic_write_seq_multi(dsi_ctx, 0x35, 0x00);
> +       mipi_dsi_generic_write_seq_multi(dsi_ctx, 0x51, 0x05, 0x42);
> +
> +       mipi_dsi_dcs_exit_sleep_mode_multi(dsi_ctx);
> +       mipi_dsi_msleep(dsi_ctx, 100);
> +       mipi_dsi_dcs_set_display_on_multi(dsi_ctx);
>

nit: Delete the extra blank line above so there's not a blank like
before the closing brace of the function.

Hopefully you can post a v3 with the blank line removed and adjust the
commit message. Then feel free to add:

Reviewed-by: Douglas Anderson <dianders@...omium.org>