[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <5744e0de7ee58d6a435e62f5740d921f143f6635.camel@pengutronix.de>
Date: Fri, 21 Jun 2024 15:51:24 +0200
From: Philipp Zabel <p.zabel@...gutronix.de>
To: Shengjiu Wang <shengjiu.wang@...il.com>
Cc: Shengjiu Wang <shengjiu.wang@....com>, abelvesa@...nel.org,
peng.fan@....com, mturquette@...libre.com, sboyd@...nel.org,
robh@...nel.org, krzk+dt@...nel.org, conor+dt@...nel.org,
shawnguo@...nel.org, s.hauer@...gutronix.de, kernel@...gutronix.de,
festevam@...il.com, marex@...x.de, linux-clk@...r.kernel.org,
imx@...ts.linux.dev, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v8 3/5] reset: imx8mp-audiomix: Add AudioMix Block
Control reset driver
On Fr, 2024-06-21 at 20:34 +0800, Shengjiu Wang wrote:
> > I wonder why we map at all. If the parent driver already has iomem
> > mapped, can't it just pass that in, like JH7110 does?
>
> Because this is a simple reset driver, just two reset bits,
> I want to avoid adding a header file for the parent driver and this driver.
Ok.
> Thanks for reviewing.
>
> By the way: shall I just send a new version for this patch only next time?
Yes, this is the only remaining patch for me to pick up, no need to
resend the patches that were already applied.
regards
Philipp
Powered by blists - more mailing lists