linux-kernel - Re: [RESEND PATCH 01/12] perf/x86/intel: Support the PEBS event mask

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <ab9ca3e3-6484-482b-aaf8-6be21dd6fc9a@linux.intel.com>
Date: Fri, 21 Jun 2024 10:19:34 -0400
From: "Liang, Kan" <kan.liang@...ux.intel.com>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Cc: mingo@...nel.org, acme@...nel.org, namhyung@...nel.org,
 irogers@...gle.com, adrian.hunter@...el.com,
 alexander.shishkin@...ux.intel.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
 ak@...ux.intel.com, eranian@...gle.com
Subject: Re: [RESEND PATCH 01/12] perf/x86/intel: Support the PEBS event mask



On 2024-06-20 11:58 a.m., Liang, Kan wrote:
> 
> 
> On 2024-06-20 3:02 a.m., Peter Zijlstra wrote:
>> On Tue, Jun 18, 2024 at 08:10:33AM -0700, kan.liang@...ux.intel.com wrote:
>>> diff --git a/arch/x86/events/intel/ds.c b/arch/x86/events/intel/ds.c
>>> index e010bfed8417..a0104c82baed 100644
>>> --- a/arch/x86/events/intel/ds.c
>>> +++ b/arch/x86/events/intel/ds.c
>>
>>> @@ -2157,6 +2157,7 @@ static void intel_pmu_drain_pebs_nhm(struct pt_regs *iregs, struct perf_sample_d
>>>  	void *base, *at, *top;
>>>  	short counts[INTEL_PMC_IDX_FIXED + MAX_FIXED_PEBS_EVENTS] = {};
>>>  	short error[INTEL_PMC_IDX_FIXED + MAX_FIXED_PEBS_EVENTS] = {};
>>> +	int max_pebs_events = hweight64(x86_pmu.pebs_events_mask);
>>
>> Consider pebs_events_mask = 0xf0, then max_pebs_events becomes 4.
> 
> The intel_pmu_drain_pebs_nhm() is a NHM specific function. It's
> impossible that there is a pebs_events_mask = 0xf0.
> 
> There are only 4 counters. The mask should always be 0xf.
>>
>>>  	int bit, i, size;
>>>  	u64 mask;
>>>  
>>> @@ -2168,8 +2169,8 @@ static void intel_pmu_drain_pebs_nhm(struct pt_regs *iregs, struct perf_sample_d
>>>  
>>>  	ds->pebs_index = ds->pebs_buffer_base;
>>>  
>>> -	mask = (1ULL << x86_pmu.max_pebs_events) - 1;
>>> -	size = x86_pmu.max_pebs_events;
>>> +	mask = x86_pmu.pebs_events_mask;
>>> +	size = max_pebs_events;
>>
>> This is wrong.. you have 8 bits to iterate, of which only the top 4 are
>> set.
>>
>>>  	if (x86_pmu.flags & PMU_FL_PEBS_ALL) {
>>>  		mask |= ((1ULL << x86_pmu.num_counters_fixed) - 1) << INTEL_PMC_IDX_FIXED;
>>>  		size = INTEL_PMC_IDX_FIXED + x86_pmu.num_counters_fixed;
>>> @@ -2208,8 +2209,8 @@ static void intel_pmu_drain_pebs_nhm(struct pt_regs *iregs, struct perf_sample_d
>>>  			pebs_status = p->status = cpuc->pebs_enabled;
>>>  
>>>  		bit = find_first_bit((unsigned long *)&pebs_status,
>>> -					x86_pmu.max_pebs_events);
>>> -		if (bit >= x86_pmu.max_pebs_events)
>>> +					max_pebs_events);
>>> +		if (bit >= max_pebs_events)
>>>  			continue;
>>
>> But the bit check here then truncates the thing to the lower 4 bits
>> which are all 0.
>>
>> Should this not be something like:
>>
>> 		if (!(pebs_event_mask & (1 << bit)))
>> 			continue;
>>
>> ?
>>
> 
> For the existing hardware, I don't think it's necessary. The counters
> are contiguous.
> 

Think about it twice. Although either code works, we should try to make
the code as generic as possible.

I will introduce a generic x86_pmu_max_num_pebs() and check the highest
set bit, rather than hweight64. It can be used by both NHM and the
future platforms.


Thanks,
Kan