linux-kernel - Re: [Patch v9 00/10] block atomic writes

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <351e602c-6af3-4d86-9c07-4a715f34cea4@oracle.com>
Date: Fri, 21 Jun 2024 15:41:49 +0100
From: John Garry <john.g.garry@...cle.com>
To: Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>, kbusch@...nel.org, hch@....de,
        sagi@...mberg.me, jejb@...ux.ibm.com, martin.petersen@...cle.com,
        viro@...iv.linux.org.uk, brauner@...nel.org, dchinner@...hat.com,
        jack@...e.cz
Cc: djwong@...nel.org, linux-block@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-nvme@...ts.infradead.org,
        linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, tytso@....edu, jbongio@...gle.com,
        linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org, ojaswin@...ux.ibm.com, linux-aio@...ck.org,
        linux-btrfs@...r.kernel.org, io-uring@...r.kernel.org,
        nilay@...ux.ibm.com, ritesh.list@...il.com, willy@...radead.org,
        agk@...hat.com, snitzer@...nel.org, mpatocka@...hat.com,
        dm-devel@...ts.linux.dev, hare@...e.de
Subject: Re: [Patch v9 00/10] block atomic writes

On 21/06/2024 15:28, Jens Axboe wrote:
>> JFYI, we will probably notice a trivial conflict in
>> include/uapi/linux/stat.h when merging, as I fixed a comment there
>> which went into v6.10-rc4 . To resolve, the version in this series can
>> be used, as it also fixes that comment.
> I did notice and resolved it when I merged it into my for-next branch.
> And then was kind of annoyed when I noticed it was caused by a patch
> from yourself as well, surely that should either have been part of the
> series, just ignored for -git, or done after the fact. Kind of pointless
> to cause conflicts with your own series right when it needs ready to go
> into the for-next tree.

ok, I will co-ordinate things better in future.

Thanks again,
John