[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20240621150058.319524-4-richard.genoud@bootlin.com>
Date: Fri, 21 Jun 2024 17:00:57 +0200
From: Richard Genoud <richard.genoud@...tlin.com>
To: Bjorn Andersson <andersson@...nel.org>,
Mathieu Poirier <mathieu.poirier@...aro.org>
Cc: Philipp Zabel <p.zabel@...gutronix.de>,
Suman Anna <s-anna@...com>,
Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@...tlin.com>,
Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@...tlin.com>,
Udit Kumar <u-kumar1@...com>,
Thomas Richard <thomas.richard@...tlin.com>,
Gregory CLEMENT <gregory.clement@...tlin.com>,
Hari Nagalla <hnagalla@...com>,
Théo Lebrun <theo.lebrun@...tlin.com>,
linux-remoteproc@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Richard Genoud <richard.genoud@...tlin.com>
Subject: [PATCH 3/4] remoteproc: k3-r5: k3_r5_rproc_stop: code reorder
In the next commit, a RP_MBOX_SHUTDOWN message will be sent in
k3_r5_rproc_stop() to the remote proc (in lockstep on not)
Thus, the sanity check "do not allow core 0 to stop before core 1"
should be moved at the beginning of the function so that the generic case
can be dealt with.
In order to have an easier patch to review, those actions are broke in
two patches:
- this patch: moving the sanity check at the beginning (No functional
change).
- next patch: doing the real job (sending shutdown messages to remote
procs before halting them).
Basically, we had:
- cluster_mode actions
- !cluster_mode sanity check
- !cluster_mode actions
And now:
- !cluster_mode sanity check
- cluster_mode actions
- !cluster_mode actions
Signed-off-by: Richard Genoud <richard.genoud@...tlin.com>
---
drivers/remoteproc/ti_k3_r5_remoteproc.c | 24 ++++++++++++++----------
1 file changed, 14 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/remoteproc/ti_k3_r5_remoteproc.c b/drivers/remoteproc/ti_k3_r5_remoteproc.c
index 1f18b08618c8..a2ead87952c7 100644
--- a/drivers/remoteproc/ti_k3_r5_remoteproc.c
+++ b/drivers/remoteproc/ti_k3_r5_remoteproc.c
@@ -636,16 +636,8 @@ static int k3_r5_rproc_stop(struct rproc *rproc)
struct k3_r5_core *core1, *core = kproc->core;
int ret;
- /* halt all applicable cores */
- if (cluster->mode == CLUSTER_MODE_LOCKSTEP) {
- list_for_each_entry(core, &cluster->cores, elem) {
- ret = k3_r5_core_halt(core);
- if (ret) {
- core = list_prev_entry(core, elem);
- goto unroll_core_halt;
- }
- }
- } else {
+
+ if (cluster->mode != CLUSTER_MODE_LOCKSTEP) {
/* do not allow core 0 to stop before core 1 */
core1 = list_last_entry(&cluster->cores, struct k3_r5_core,
elem);
@@ -656,6 +648,18 @@ static int k3_r5_rproc_stop(struct rproc *rproc)
ret = -EPERM;
goto out;
}
+ }
+
+ /* halt all applicable cores */
+ if (cluster->mode == CLUSTER_MODE_LOCKSTEP) {
+ list_for_each_entry(core, &cluster->cores, elem) {
+ ret = k3_r5_core_halt(core);
+ if (ret) {
+ core = list_prev_entry(core, elem);
+ goto unroll_core_halt;
+ }
+ }
+ } else {
ret = k3_r5_core_halt(core);
if (ret)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists