[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1d5a8d4f-8236-4092-ae9e-3885bce097e6@linux.microsoft.com>
Date: Fri, 21 Jun 2024 09:09:21 -0700
From: Easwar Hariharan <eahariha@...ux.microsoft.com>
To: Wolfram Sang <wsa+renesas@...g-engineering.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: eahariha@...ux.microsoft.com, Andi Shyti <andi.shyti@...nel.org>,
linux-i2c@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 4/6] docs: i2c: summary: document use of inclusive
language
On 6/21/2024 12:30 AM, Wolfram Sang wrote:
> We now have the updated I2C specs and our own Code of Conduct, so we
> have all we need to switch over to the inclusive terminology. Define
> them here.
>
> Signed-off-by: Wolfram Sang <wsa+renesas@...g-engineering.com>
> ---
> Documentation/i2c/i2c_bus.svg | 15 ++++++++-------
> Documentation/i2c/summary.rst | 23 +++++++++++++++++------
> 2 files changed, 25 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)
>
Looks good to me.
Reviewed-by: Easwar Hariharan <eahariha@...ux.microsoft.com>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists