linux-kernel - Re: [RFC PATCH v5 00/29] TDX KVM selftests

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date: Fri, 21 Jun 2024 15:52:57 -0500
From: Sagi Shahar <sagis@...gle.com>
To: "Edgecombe, Rick P" <rick.p.edgecombe@...el.com>
Cc: "Zhao, Yan Y" <yan.y.zhao@...el.com>, "Aktas, Erdem" <erdemaktas@...gle.com>, 
	"vipinsh@...gle.com" <vipinsh@...gle.com>, "shuah@...nel.org" <shuah@...nel.org>, 
	"Xu, Haibo1" <haibo1.xu@...el.com>, "kvm@...r.kernel.org" <kvm@...r.kernel.org>, 
	"Afranji, Ryan" <afranji@...gle.com>, "dmatlack@...gle.com" <dmatlack@...gle.com>, 
	"seanjc@...gle.com" <seanjc@...gle.com>, "pbonzini@...hat.com" <pbonzini@...hat.com>, 
	"linux-mm@...ck.org" <linux-mm@...ck.org>, "Yamahata, Isaku" <isaku.yamahata@...el.com>, 
	"ackerleytng@...gle.com" <ackerleytng@...gle.com>, "Verma, Vishal L" <vishal.l.verma@...el.com>, 
	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, "jmattson@...gle.com" <jmattson@...gle.com>, 
	"Annapurve, Vishal" <vannapurve@...gle.com>, "runanwang@...gle.com" <runanwang@...gle.com>, 
	"linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org>, 
	"chao.p.peng@...ux.intel.com" <chao.p.peng@...ux.intel.com>, "pgonda@...gle.com" <pgonda@...gle.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v5 00/29] TDX KVM selftests

On Thu, Jun 20, 2024 at 9:51 PM Edgecombe, Rick P
<rick.p.edgecombe@...el.com> wrote:
>
> +Yan
>
> On Wed, 2024-06-05 at 14:44 -0700, Rick Edgecombe wrote:
> > > I will take a look at rebasing the selftests on top of the Intel
> > > development branch and I can post it on our github branch. We can talk
> > > about co-development offline. We already have some code that was
> > > suggested by Isaku as part of our tests.
> >
> > That would be great, thanks.
>
> Hi,
>
> Any update on this rebase?

I finished rebasing the basic life cycle test and found a bug in
tdx_gmem_post_populate which took me some time to debug and fix.
I'm going to start a separate thread to share and discuss the selftests.

>
> Thanks,
>
> Rick